Knight T, Forman D, Leach S A, Packer P, Cocco G, Palli D, Pirastu R
Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
IARC Sci Publ. 1991(105):146-51.
The N-nitrosoproline (NPRO) test has been used in studies in which populations at high risk of cancer have been compared with equivalent populations at lower risk, to examine whether the geographical variation in cancer risk correlates with propensity for endogenous nitrosation, as assessed by the NPRO test. The usual method employed has been to determine NPRO in 12- or 24-h urine samples, after ingestion of L-proline, in a representative sample of the general population. We present results from one such geographical study conducted in two regions of Italy (Florence and Cagliari) with an approximately three-fold variation in gastric cancer mortality. The nonsignificant difference in mean NPRO excretion between the two populations was insufficient to explain the difference in cancer risk. The fact that there are appreciable international differences in formation of NPRO suggests, firstly, that nitrosation may be of relevance to cancer risk in some countries but not in others and, secondly, that variations within one country may not be large enough for significant geographical differences to be evident. Multivariate analysis of individual, rather than grouped, results from our Italian study made it possible to quantify the relevance of different factors to NPRO formation: a major factor is exposure to nitrate. Important relationships may be missed by analysing only grouped data.
N-亚硝基脯氨酸(NPRO)试验已用于一些研究中,这些研究将癌症高风险人群与风险较低的同等人群进行比较,以检验癌症风险的地理差异是否与通过NPRO试验评估的内源性亚硝化倾向相关。通常采用的方法是,在摄入L-脯氨酸后,在普通人群的代表性样本中测定12小时或24小时尿液样本中的NPRO。我们展示了在意大利两个地区(佛罗伦萨和卡利亚里)进行的一项此类地理研究的结果,这两个地区的胃癌死亡率大约相差三倍。这两个人群之间NPRO平均排泄量的差异不显著,不足以解释癌症风险的差异。NPRO形成存在明显国际差异这一事实表明,首先,亚硝化在某些国家可能与癌症风险相关,而在其他国家则不然;其次,一个国家内部的差异可能不够大,以至于无法明显看出显著的地理差异。对我们意大利研究中个体而非分组的结果进行多变量分析,使得量化不同因素与NPRO形成的相关性成为可能:一个主要因素是硝酸盐暴露。仅分析分组数据可能会遗漏重要关系。