Gonzalez Richard P, Cummings Glenn R, Phelan Herbert A, Mulekar Madhuri S, Rodning Charles B
Department of Surgery, Center for Study of Rural Vehicular Trauma, University of South Alabama, 2451 Fillingim St., Mobile, AL 36617, USA.
Am J Surg. 2009 Jan;197(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.018. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
Fatality rates from rural vehicular trauma are almost double those found in urban settings. It has been suggested that increased prehospital time is a factor that adversely affects fatality rates in rural vehicular trauma. By linking and analyzing Alabama's statewide prehospital data, emergency medical services (EMS) prehospital time was assessed for rural and urban vehicular crashes.
An imputational methodology permitted linkage of data from police motor vehicle crash (MVC) and EMS records. MVCs were defined as rural or urban by crash location using the United States Census Bureau criteria. Areas within Alabama that fell outside the Census Bureau definition of urban were defined as rural. Prehospital data were analyzed to determine EMS response time, scene time, and transport time in rural and urban settings.
Over a 2-year period from January 2001 through December 2002, data were collected from EMS Patient Care Reports and police crash reports for the entire state of Alabama. By using an imputational methodology and join specifications, 45,763 police crash reports were linked to EMS Patient Care Reports. Of these, 34,341 (75%) were injured in rural settings and 11,422 (25%) were injured in urban settings. A total of 714 mortalities were identified, of which 611 (1.78%) occurred in rural settings and 103 (.90%) occurred in urban settings (P < .0001). When mortalities occurred, the mean EMS response time in rural settings was 10.67 minutes and 6.50 minutes in urban settings (P < .0001). When mortalities occurred, the mean EMS scene time in rural settings was 18.87 minutes and 10.83 minutes in urban settings (patients who were dead on scene and extrication patients were excluded from both settings) (P < .0001). When mortalities occurred, the mean EMS transport time in rural settings was 12.45 minutes and 7.43 minutes in urban settings (P < .0001). When mortalities occurred, the overall mean prehospital time in rural settings was 42.0 minutes and 24.8 minutes in urban settings (P < .0001). The mean EMS response time for rural MVCs with survivors was 8.54 minutes versus a mean of 10.67 minutes with mortalities (P < .0001). The mean EMS scene time for rural MVCs with survivors was 14.81 minutes versus 18.87 minutes with mortalities (patients who were dead on scene and extrication patients were excluded) (P = .0014).
Based on this statewide analysis of MVCs, increased EMS prehospital time appears to be associated with higher mortality rates in rural settings.
农村地区车辆创伤的死亡率几乎是城市地区的两倍。有人认为,院前时间延长是对农村车辆创伤死亡率产生不利影响的一个因素。通过链接和分析阿拉巴马州全州的院前数据,对农村和城市车辆碰撞事故的紧急医疗服务(EMS)院前时间进行了评估。
一种推算方法允许将警方机动车碰撞(MVC)数据与EMS记录相链接。根据碰撞地点,使用美国人口普查局的标准将MVC定义为农村或城市。阿拉巴马州内不属于人口普查局城市定义范围的地区被定义为农村。对院前数据进行分析,以确定农村和城市环境中的EMS响应时间、现场时间和转运时间。
在2001年1月至2002年12月的两年期间,从阿拉巴马州全州的EMS患者护理报告和警方碰撞报告中收集数据。通过使用推算方法和连接规范,45763份警方碰撞报告与EMS患者护理报告相链接。其中,34341例(75%)在农村地区受伤,11422例(25%)在城市地区受伤。共确定714例死亡病例,其中611例(1.78%)发生在农村地区,103例(0.90%)发生在城市地区(P <.0001)。当发生死亡病例时,农村地区的平均EMS响应时间为10.67分钟,城市地区为6.50分钟(P <.0001)。当发生死亡病例时,农村地区的平均EMS现场时间为18.87分钟,城市地区为10.83分钟(现场死亡患者和救援患者均被排除在两种情况之外)(P <.0001)。当发生死亡病例时,农村地区的平均EMS转运时间为12.45分钟,城市地区为7.43分钟(P <.0001)。当发生死亡病例时,农村地区的总体平均院前时间为42.0分钟,城市地区为24.8分钟(P <.0001)。农村地区有存活者的MVC的平均EMS响应时间为8.54分钟,而有死亡病例的平均响应时间为10.67分钟(P <.0001)。农村地区有存活者的MVC的平均EMS现场时间为14.81分钟,而有死亡病例的为18.87分钟(现场死亡患者和救援患者被排除)(P =.0014)。
基于对全州MVC的分析,EMS院前时间延长似乎与农村地区较高的死亡率相关。