Bannerman Rachel L, Milders Maarten, De Gelder Beatrice, Sahraie Arash
Vision Research Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2UB, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jul;28(4):317-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00568.x.
Three experiments investigated whether emotional information influences perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. In Experiment 1, rival emotional and neutral faces in the background were coupled with grating stimuli in the foreground. Results showed that gratings paired with emotional faces dominated over those paired with neutral faces. In Experiment 2, emotional and neutral faces were presented dichoptically, without being paired with other stimuli. Dominance of emotional faces was observed. Fusion and low-level image differences were ruled out by examining dominance periods of upright and inverted emotional and neutral faces presented as face-house pairs (Experiment 3). Here, face stimuli dominated over house stimuli only for upright face conditions. In addition, upright emotional faces were perceived for significantly longer durations than upright neutral faces. The results provide further support for the influence of emotional meaning on binocular rivalry.
三项实验研究了情绪信息在双眼竞争过程中是否会影响知觉优势。在实验1中,背景中相互竞争的情绪面孔和中性面孔与前景中的光栅刺激相配对。结果显示,与情绪面孔配对的光栅比与中性面孔配对的光栅占主导地位。在实验2中,情绪面孔和中性面孔以双眼分视的方式呈现,且未与其他刺激配对。观察到情绪面孔占主导地位。通过检查以脸-房子配对形式呈现的正立和倒立情绪面孔及中性面孔的主导期,排除了融合和低水平图像差异的影响(实验3)。在此实验中,只有在正立面孔条件下,面孔刺激才比房子刺激占主导地位。此外,正立情绪面孔的被感知持续时间明显长于正立中性面孔。这些结果为情绪意义对双眼竞争的影响提供了进一步的支持。