Rodríguez-Avila Andrés, Oldoni Ivomar, Riblet Sylva, Garcia Maricarmen
Department of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Avian Pathol. 2008 Jun;37(3):287-92. doi: 10.1080/03079450802043742.
In a recent study (Oldoni & García, 2007), some field strains of infectious laryngotracheitis viruses (ILTV) were characterized as genotypically different (group VI) from ILT vaccine strains. The objective of this study was to evaluate the protection elicited by one chicken embryo origin (CEO) and one tissue culture origin (TCO) vaccine against a field isolate from group VI after direct and indirect exposure to ILTV live attenuated vaccines. In phase 1 of the experiment, non-vaccinated chickens were placed into contact with the eye drop vaccinates for a period of four weeks after vaccination. Transmission of the vaccine virus to these in-contact birds was demonstrated by real time PCR and antibody production, although the in-contact birds did not become protected against disease when subsequently challenged in phase 2 of the experiment. This emphasized the importance of uniform vaccination to obtain adequate protection, both to avoid the occurrence of susceptible chickens, and to minimize the potential for reversion to virulence of live-attenuated vaccines. In phase 2, protection against challenge with a group VI field virus was assessed four weeks after vaccination by scoring clinical signs and mortality, and quantifying weight gain. Sentinel birds were added to the groups one day after challenge to assess shedding of challenge virus, using real time PCR and virus isolation, during the period 2 to 12 days post challenge. The results showed that the CEO and TCO eye drop-vaccinated chickens were protected against challenge with the group VI virus, even though it was genetically different from the vaccine strains, and that challenge virus was not transmitted from these protected birds to the sentinels.
在最近的一项研究中(奥尔东尼和加西亚,2007年),一些传染性喉气管炎病毒(ILTV)的野外毒株在基因型上被鉴定为与ILT疫苗毒株不同(第六组)。本研究的目的是评估一种鸡胚源(CEO)疫苗和一种组织培养源(TCO)疫苗在直接和间接接触ILTV减毒活疫苗后,对第六组野外分离株所引发的保护作用。在实验的第一阶段,未接种疫苗的鸡在接种疫苗后与滴眼接种的鸡接触四周。通过实时PCR和抗体产生证明了疫苗病毒向这些接触鸡的传播,尽管在实验的第二阶段对这些接触鸡进行后续攻毒时,它们并未获得针对疾病的保护。这强调了统一接种疫苗以获得充分保护的重要性,既可以避免出现易感鸡,又可以将减毒活疫苗毒力返强的可能性降至最低。在第二阶段,在接种疫苗四周后,通过对临床症状和死亡率进行评分以及对体重增加进行量化,评估对第六组野外病毒攻毒的保护作用。在攻毒后一天,将哨兵鸡添加到各实验组中,以评估在攻毒后2至12天期间使用实时PCR和病毒分离技术检测攻毒病毒的排毒情况。结果表明,经CEO和TCO滴眼接种的鸡对第六组病毒的攻毒具有保护作用,即使该病毒在基因上与疫苗毒株不同,并且攻毒病毒未从这些受保护的鸡传播给哨兵鸡。