McKay Mary Pat, Coben Jeffrey H, Larkin Gregory Luke, Shaffer Alison
Center for Injury Prevention and Control, The Ronald Reagan Institute of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20034, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(3):217-23. doi: 10.1080/15389580802005660.
To determine the attitudes of teens and parents in Pennsylvania (PA) towards the enhanced graduated driver licensing (GDL) system implemented in 2000, and to assess their understanding of teen crash risk.
Cross-sectional survey of teen drivers and their parents. Eligible teens were 16 or 17 years old when they obtained their first learner's permits in 2000. A simple random sample of 2500 was obtained from 48,372 meeting inclusion criteria. Questions were based on previous surveys and pre-tested in focus groups.
Chi-square, McNemar, or t-tests, as appropriate.
A total of 1561 surveys (811 parents and 750 teens) were included in the analysis. There were no differences between the sample and teen respondents. Their junior license had been achieved by 735 (98%) teens and had been driving unsupervised for a mean of 14.1 months (SD 4.89). Greater than ninety percent (90%) of parents approved of the overall system, the six-month learner phase, and the requirement for parental certification of 50 hours of supervised driving. The teens' reactions were less positive than the parents' (p < 0.001), but only 16% reported a negative overall reaction. 31.4% of the teens reported not completing the required 50 hours of supervised driving. 70.6% of parents felt the nighttime driving restriction was "just right" at 11 pm but 54.0% of teens preferred that it be returned to 12 mn (p < 0.001). When asked about the crash rate for teen drivers, 72.8% of teens and 74.0% of parents chose rates 2 to 100 times less than the reported crash rate (p = 0.8).
In PA, the primary stakeholders, teen drivers and their parents, were poorly informed about teen crash risk. Parents were very positive and teens are generally neutral or weakly positive about the new restrictions imposed by the enhanced graduated driver licensing system. Better understanding of the crash rate for teen drivers might increase approval of system restrictions, enhance compliance, and further strengthen the system.
确定宾夕法尼亚州(PA)青少年及其父母对2000年实施的强化分级驾照(GDL)系统的态度,并评估他们对青少年撞车风险的理解。
对青少年驾驶员及其父母进行横断面调查。符合条件的青少年是在2000年首次获得学习许可证时年龄为16或17岁。从48372名符合纳入标准的人群中获得了一个2500人的简单随机样本。问题基于先前的调查并在焦点小组中进行了预测试。
酌情采用卡方检验、麦克尼马尔检验或t检验。
共有1561份调查问卷(811名父母和750名青少年)纳入分析。样本与青少年受访者之间没有差异。735名(98%)青少年获得了初级驾照,并且在无监督情况下驾驶的平均时间为14.1个月(标准差4.89)。超过90%的父母赞成整个系统、为期六个月的学习阶段以及要求父母证明有50小时的监督驾驶时间。青少年的反应不如父母积极(p < 0.001),但只有16%的人报告了负面的总体反应。31.4%的青少年报告未完成所需的50小时监督驾驶时间。70.6%的父母认为晚上11点的夜间驾驶限制“恰到好处”,但54.0%的青少年希望恢复到午夜12点(p < 0.001)。当被问及青少年驾驶员的撞车率时,72.8%的青少年和74.0%的父母选择的撞车率比报告的撞车率低2至100倍(p = 0.8)。
在宾夕法尼亚州,主要利益相关者,即青少年驾驶员及其父母,对青少年撞车风险了解不足。父母非常积极,而青少年对强化分级驾照系统实施的新限制普遍持中立或微弱积极态度。更好地了解青少年驾驶员的撞车率可能会增加对系统限制的认可,提高合规性,并进一步加强该系统。