Suppr超能文献

二维与实时三维双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图的头对头比较。

Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

作者信息

Varnero Silvia, Santagata Patricia, Pratali Lorenza, Basso Massimiliano, Gandolfo Alfredo, Bellotti Paolo

机构信息

Servizio di Cardiologia, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008 Jun 20;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-31.

Abstract

Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 +/- 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased - array 1.6-2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2-4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 x 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 +/- 21 sec vs 40 +/- 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 +/- 0.5 min for 2D and 13 +/- 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 +/- 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 +/- 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use.

摘要

实时三维(RT-3D)超声心动图已进入临床实践,但应用于负荷超声心动图时,相对于标准二维超声心动图(2D)的真正增量价值仍不确定。本研究的目的是确定RT-3D负荷超声心动图相对于标准2D负荷超声心动图的附加价值。我们评估了23例连续患者(年龄=65±10岁,16例男性),这些患者因双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图检查而就诊,使用配备有用于2D成像的具有二次谐波功能的1.6 - 2.5 MHz相控阵探头和用于RT-3D成像的可产生包含整个左心室的60×70容积金字塔数据的2 - 4 MHz矩阵相控阵换能器的Sonos 7500(飞利浦医疗系统公司,帕洛阿尔托,加利福尼亚州)。在所有患者中,图像以2D和3D形式数字存储,用于基线和负荷峰值状态,采集之间的延迟小于60秒。由两位专业负荷超声心动图专家联合阅读,对2D图像进行在线壁运动分析,对RT-3D图像进行离线壁运动分析。节段图像质量从1分(优秀)到5分(无法解读)进行评分。所有患者均获得了可解读的图像。2D图像的采集时间为67±21秒,而RT-3D为40±22秒(p = 0.5)。2D壁运动分析时间为2.8±0.5分钟,3D为13±7分钟(p = 0.0001)。2D节段图像质量评分为1.4±0.5,3D为2.6±0.7(p = 0.0001)。23例患者中有5例检测结果为阳性。在这5例阳性检查中,2D和RT-3D有3例结果一致。2D和RT-3D之间的总体负荷结果(阳性与阴性)一致性为91%(Kappa = 0.80)。在双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图检查期间,RT-3D成像高度可行,且与标准2D负荷超声心动图显示出较高的一致性。2D图像采集时间更长,RT-3D分析更耗时。目前,尚无明确的临床优势证明常规使用RT-3D负荷超声心动图是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0423/2474587/0dacb8c8209c/1476-7120-6-31-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验