Varnero Silvia, Santagata Patricia, Pratali Lorenza, Basso Massimiliano, Gandolfo Alfredo, Bellotti Paolo
Servizio di Cardiologia, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008 Jun 20;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-31.
Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 +/- 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased - array 1.6-2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2-4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 x 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 +/- 21 sec vs 40 +/- 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 +/- 0.5 min for 2D and 13 +/- 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 +/- 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 +/- 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use.
实时三维(RT-3D)超声心动图已进入临床实践,但应用于负荷超声心动图时,相对于标准二维超声心动图(2D)的真正增量价值仍不确定。本研究的目的是确定RT-3D负荷超声心动图相对于标准2D负荷超声心动图的附加价值。我们评估了23例连续患者(年龄=65±10岁,16例男性),这些患者因双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图检查而就诊,使用配备有用于2D成像的具有二次谐波功能的1.6 - 2.5 MHz相控阵探头和用于RT-3D成像的可产生包含整个左心室的60×70容积金字塔数据的2 - 4 MHz矩阵相控阵换能器的Sonos 7500(飞利浦医疗系统公司,帕洛阿尔托,加利福尼亚州)。在所有患者中,图像以2D和3D形式数字存储,用于基线和负荷峰值状态,采集之间的延迟小于60秒。由两位专业负荷超声心动图专家联合阅读,对2D图像进行在线壁运动分析,对RT-3D图像进行离线壁运动分析。节段图像质量从1分(优秀)到5分(无法解读)进行评分。所有患者均获得了可解读的图像。2D图像的采集时间为67±21秒,而RT-3D为40±22秒(p = 0.5)。2D壁运动分析时间为2.8±0.5分钟,3D为13±7分钟(p = 0.0001)。2D节段图像质量评分为1.4±0.5,3D为2.6±0.7(p = 0.0001)。23例患者中有5例检测结果为阳性。在这5例阳性检查中,2D和RT-3D有3例结果一致。2D和RT-3D之间的总体负荷结果(阳性与阴性)一致性为91%(Kappa = 0.80)。在双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图检查期间,RT-3D成像高度可行,且与标准2D负荷超声心动图显示出较高的一致性。2D图像采集时间更长,RT-3D分析更耗时。目前,尚无明确的临床优势证明常规使用RT-3D负荷超声心动图是合理的。