Lotrakul Manote, Sumrithe Sutida, Saipanish Ratana
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 20;8:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-46.
Most depression screening tools in Thailand are lengthy. The long process makes them impractical for routine use in primary care. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of a Thai version Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a screening tool for major depression in primary care patients.
The English language PHQ-9 was translated into Thai. The process involved back-translation, cross-cultural adaptation, field testing of the pre-final version, as well as final adjustments. The PHQ-9 was then administered among 1,000 patients in family practice clinic. Of these 1,000 patients, 300 were further assessed by the Thai version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and the Thai version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). These tools served as gold-standards for diagnosing depression and for assessing symptom severity, respectively. In the assessment, reliability and validity analyses, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed.
Complete data were obtained from 924 participants and 279 interviewed respondents. The mean age of the participants was 45.0 years (SD = 14.3) and 73.7% of them were females. The mean PHQ-9 score was 4.93 (SD = 3.75). The Thai version of the PHQ-9 had satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and showed moderate convergent validity with the HAM-D (r = 0.56; P < 0.001). The categorical algorithm of the PHQ-9 had low sensitivity (0.53) but very high specificity (0.98) and positive likelihood ratio (27.37). Used as a continuous measure, the optimal cut-off score of PHQ-9 >/= 9 revealed a sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.77, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.21, negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99, and positive likelihood ratio of 3.71. The area under the curve (AUC) in this study was 0.89 (SD = 0.05, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92).
The Thai version of the PHQ-9 has acceptable psychometric properties for screening for major depression in general practice with a recommended cut-off score of nine or greater.
泰国大多数抑郁症筛查工具都很长。这个漫长的过程使得它们在基层医疗中日常使用不太实际。本研究旨在检验泰语版患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)作为基层医疗患者重度抑郁症筛查工具的信度和效度。
将英文版的PHQ - 9翻译成泰语。这个过程包括回译、跨文化调适、预终版的现场测试以及最终调整。然后在一家家庭医疗诊所的1000名患者中使用PHQ - 9。在这1000名患者中,300名进一步通过泰语版的迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI)和泰语版的汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM - D)进行评估。这些工具分别作为诊断抑郁症和评估症状严重程度的金标准。在评估中,进行了信度和效度分析以及受试者工作特征曲线分析。
从924名参与者和279名接受访谈的受访者那里获得了完整数据。参与者的平均年龄为45.0岁(标准差 = 14.3),其中73.7%为女性。PHQ - 9的平均得分为4.93(标准差 = 3.75)。泰语版的PHQ - 9具有令人满意的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.79),并且与HAM - D显示出中等程度的收敛效度(r = 0.56;P < 0.001)。PHQ - 9的分类算法敏感性较低(0.53),但特异性非常高(0.98)和阳性似然比很高(27.37)。用作连续测量时,PHQ - 9≥9的最佳截断分数显示出敏感性为0.84,特异性为0.77,阳性预测值(PPV)为0.21,阴性预测值(NPV)为0.99,阳性似然比为3.71。本研究中的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.89(标准差 = 0.05,95%置信区间0.85至0.92)。
泰语版的PHQ - 9在基层医疗中筛查重度抑郁症具有可接受的心理测量特性,推荐的截断分数为9分或更高。