Pitanupong Jarurin, Traivaranon Kwanpond, Buathong Napakkawat
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0323866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323866. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to examine perceived family functioning among individuals with depression, then compare these perceptions with those of the general population.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals with depression at Songklanagarind Hospital and individuals from the general population; from May to July 2024. Participants completed three questionnaires: 1) Personal and demographic inquiry, 2) the Family State and Functioning Assessment Scale (FSFAS-25), and 3) the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student's t-test.
The study compared 41 individuals with depression with 41 from the general population; revealing significant differences in family functioning scores. The depression group reported lower median family functioning scores (76 [IQR 64-84]) compared with the general population (87 [IQR 77-93]). Fewer individuals in the depression group reported high total family functioning scores (56.1% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.016). They also showed lower percentages in family support (61.0% vs. 95.1%, p < 0.001) and discipline dimensions (46.3% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.006). Furthermore, those with residual depression symptoms (PHQ-9 having a score of nine or higher) showed significant differences in family support (37.5% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.033) and emotional status (18.8% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.023) compared with those without residual depression symptoms.
Individuals with depression demonstrated lower levels of family functioning compared with the general population. Acknowledging and addressing the influence of family dynamics on the development and persistence of the disorder may be essential for improving treatment outcomes. Integrating these factors into person-centered mental health interventions can lead to more comprehensive, individualized, and effective care.
本研究旨在调查抑郁症患者对家庭功能的认知,然后将这些认知与普通人群的认知进行比较。
于2024年5月至7月在宋卡那卡林医院的抑郁症患者和普通人群中开展了一项横断面研究。参与者完成了三份问卷:1)个人和人口统计学调查,2)家庭状况与功能评估量表(FSFAS - 25),以及3)患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)。数据分析包括描述性统计、卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验、威尔科克森秩和检验以及学生t检验。
该研究将41名抑郁症患者与41名普通人群进行了比较;结果显示家庭功能得分存在显著差异。抑郁症组报告的家庭功能得分中位数(76[四分位间距64 - 84])低于普通人群(87[四分位间距77 - 93])。抑郁症组中报告家庭功能总分高的个体较少(56.1%对82.9%,p = 0.016)。他们在家庭支持(61.0%对95.1%,p < 0.001)和纪律维度(46.3%对78.0%,p = 0.006)方面的比例也较低。此外,有残留抑郁症状(PHQ - 9得分9分或更高)的患者与没有残留抑郁症状的患者相比,在家庭支持(37.5%对76.0%,p = 0.033)和情绪状态(18.8%对60.0%,p = 0.023)方面存在显著差异。
与普通人群相比,抑郁症患者的家庭功能水平较低。认识并解决家庭动态对该疾病发生和持续存在的影响可能对改善治疗效果至关重要。将这些因素纳入以患者为中心的心理健康干预措施中,可以带来更全面、个性化和有效的护理。