Aldridge Georgina M, Podrebarac David M, Greenough William T, Weiler Ivan Jeanne
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jul 30;172(2):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 May 15.
Western blots are used to estimate the relative concentrations of proteins of interest based on staining by specific antibodies. Quantitative measurements are often subject to error due to overloading of the loading control and over-reliance on normalization. We have found that at the protein concentrations normally used to quantify most low-abundance proteins of interest, frequently used single-protein loading controls, such as glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and beta-actin, do not accurately reflect differences in protein concentration. Two total protein stains, SYPRO Ruby and Amido Black, were compared and found to be acceptable alternatives to single-protein controls. Although we cannot prove that high-abundance loading controls are inaccurate under all possible conditions, we conclude that the burden of proof should lie with the researcher to demonstrate that their loading control is reflective of quantitative differences in protein concentration.
蛋白质免疫印迹法用于根据特异性抗体的染色来估计目标蛋白质的相对浓度。由于上样对照超载和过度依赖标准化,定量测量常常会出现误差。我们发现,在通常用于定量大多数低丰度目标蛋白质的蛋白质浓度下,常用的单蛋白质上样对照,如甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶(GAPDH)和β-肌动蛋白,不能准确反映蛋白质浓度的差异。我们比较了两种总蛋白质染色剂SYPRO Ruby和氨基黑,发现它们是单蛋白质对照的可接受替代物。虽然我们无法证明高丰度上样对照在所有可能条件下都是不准确的,但我们得出结论,举证责任应由研究人员承担,以证明他们的上样对照能够反映蛋白质浓度的定量差异。