• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5岁女童和男童的词汇发展水平以及与感觉统合和平衡相关的选定要素

Level of Vocabulary Development and Selected Elements Regarding Sensory Integration and Balance in 5-Year-Old Girls and Boys.

作者信息

Wilczyński Jacek, Ślęzak Grzegorz

机构信息

Laboratory of Posturology, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Al. IX Wieków Kielc 19, 25-317 Kielce, Poland.

Municipal Psychological and Pedagogical Clinic Complex, Kielce, 75-215 Koszalin, Poland.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;8(3):200. doi: 10.3390/children8030200.

DOI:10.3390/children8030200
PMID:33800019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7999570/
Abstract

The aim of this research was to assess relationships between the level of vocabulary and selected elements of sensory integration and balance in 5-year-old girls and boys, showing the differences between them. The study group consisted of 290 5-year-old children (172 boys and 118 girls) with different levels of vocabulary development and selected disturbances in sensory integration and balance processes. To evaluate the developmental deficits of speech with regard to vocabulary, the Children's Dictionary Test was used. The Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance was also employed. In our research's overall assessment, 118 children, i.e., 41%, had a low level of vocabulary, while 108 (37%) had an average level and 64 (22%) had a high level. However, the average score of all examined children (3.71 stens) indicates a low level of vocabulary development. Less developed vocabulary skills included the ability to create subordinate words and define concepts. There were no significant differences in the level of vocabulary between girls and boys. We observed disorders concerning selected elements of sensory integration and balance in most of the children, and more often in boys. There were statistically significant relationships between the level of vocabulary and selected disorders of sensory integration and balance; however, they were not unambiguous. Children with the lowest level of vocabulary in overall assessment obtained significantly the worst results in the Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (CTSIB) open eyes, hard surface test. However, in the closed eyes, hard surface test, the lowest score was obtained by children with a high overall assessment. In turn, in the open eyes, soft surface test, the lowest score was noted for children with average overall assessment. In the complex CTSIB test, the lowest score was achieved by children with low ability to define concepts. The problem of the relationship between vocabulary level of and sensory integration as well as balance requires further research. The demonstrated significant relationships between some aspects of vocabulary level and selected elements of sensory integration as well as balance confirm the need to care for the overall psychomotor sphere of a child.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估5岁女童和男童的词汇水平与感觉统合及平衡的选定要素之间的关系,并揭示两者之间的差异。研究组由290名5岁儿童组成(172名男孩和118名女孩),他们的词汇发展水平不同,且在感觉统合和平衡过程中存在选定的障碍。为评估与词汇相关的言语发育缺陷,使用了儿童词典测试。还采用了感觉统合与平衡临床测试。在我们研究的总体评估中,118名儿童(即41%)词汇水平较低,108名(37%)处于平均水平,64名(22%)处于较高水平。然而,所有受检儿童的平均得分(3.71 sten)表明词汇发展水平较低。词汇技能发展较差的方面包括创造从属词和定义概念的能力。女孩和男孩在词汇水平上没有显著差异。我们观察到大多数儿童在感觉统合和平衡的选定要素方面存在障碍,男孩中更为常见。词汇水平与感觉统合和平衡的选定障碍之间存在统计学上的显著关系;然而,并不明确。在总体评估中词汇水平最低的儿童在感觉统合与平衡临床测试(CTSIB)睁眼硬表面测试中取得了明显最差的成绩。然而,在闭眼硬表面测试中,总体评估较高的儿童得分最低。相应地,在睁眼软表面测试中,总体评估为平均水平的儿童得分最低。在复杂的CTSIB测试中,定义概念能力低的儿童得分最低。词汇水平与感觉统合以及平衡之间的关系问题需要进一步研究。词汇水平的某些方面与感觉统合和平衡的选定要素之间已证明的显著关系证实了关注儿童整体心理运动领域的必要性。

相似文献

1
Level of Vocabulary Development and Selected Elements Regarding Sensory Integration and Balance in 5-Year-Old Girls and Boys.5岁女童和男童的词汇发展水平以及与感觉统合和平衡相关的选定要素
Children (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;8(3):200. doi: 10.3390/children8030200.
2
Quantitative Assessment of Sensory Integration and Balance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Cross-Sectional Study.自闭症谱系障碍儿童感觉统合与平衡的定量评估:横断面研究。
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 3;9(3):353. doi: 10.3390/children9030353.
3
[Individual and family factors influencing vocabulary development in toddlers].影响幼儿词汇发展的个体和家庭因素
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Dec;42(12):908-12.
4
Evaluating validity of the Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance (CTSIB) criteria to categorise stance postural control of ambulant children with CP.评估 Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) 临床平衡感觉统合测试 (CTSIB) 标准对分类 CP 患儿立位姿势控制的有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jul;44(15):4039-4046. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1887374. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
5
Linguistic markers of autism in girls: evidence of a "blended phenotype" during storytelling.女孩自闭症的语言标记:故事讲述中“混合表型”的证据。
Mol Autism. 2019 Mar 27;10:14. doi: 10.1186/s13229-019-0268-2. eCollection 2019.
6
Body balance analysis of children and youth with intellectual disabilities.智力残疾儿童和青少年的身体平衡分析。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Nov;63(11):1312-1323. doi: 10.1111/jir.12671. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
EFFECTS OF SENSORY INTEGRATION THERAPY ON SELECTED FITNESS SKILLS IN AUTISTIC CHILDREN.感觉统合疗法对自闭症儿童特定体能技能的影响
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(8):1620-1625.
8
Sex differences and normative data for the m-CTSIB and sensory integration on baseline concussion assessment in collegiate athletes.大学生运动员脑震荡基础评估中 m-CTSIB 和感觉综合的性别差异和正常值数据。
Brain Inj. 2020;34(1):20-25. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1669824. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
9
Gesture-speech integration is related to vocabulary skills in children with developmental language disorder, Williams syndrome and typical development.手势与言语的整合与发育性语言障碍儿童、威廉姆斯综合征儿童以及发育正常儿童的词汇技能有关。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):206-220. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12780. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
Language skills in 5-8-year-old children with 22q11 deletion syndrome.患有22q11缺失综合征的5至8岁儿童的语言技能。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 May-Jun;41(3):313-33. doi: 10.1080/13682820500361497.

引用本文的文献

1
Decreased Balance Function in School-Aged Children with Behavioral Problems.有行为问题的学龄儿童平衡功能下降。
Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 16;12(1):117. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12010117.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlations of somatic traits and postural defects in girls and boys aged 10-12.10至12岁女孩和男孩的身体特征与姿势缺陷的相关性
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2019;21(1):79-86.
2
The study design of ComAlong Toddler: a randomised controlled trial of an early communication intervention.Com Along Toddler:一项早期沟通干预的随机对照试验的研究设计。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Jun;48(4):391-399. doi: 10.1177/1403494819834755. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Tutorial: Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders.教程:言语运动链治疗法在学龄期儿童言语语音障碍中的应用。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Jul 12;50(3):343-355. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0081. Epub 2019 May 3.
4
Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters.语言能力与熟悉说话者优势:向不熟悉说话者推广才是关键。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 May 21;62(5):1427-1436. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0160.
5
Preliminary evaluation of a low-intensity parent training program on speech-language stimulation for children with language delay.一项针对语言发育迟缓儿童的低强度家长培训项目对言语语言刺激效果的初步评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jul;122:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.03.034. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
6
Modeling early lexico-semantic network development: Perceptual features matter most.建模早期词汇语义网络发展:感知特征最为重要。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Apr;148(4):763-782. doi: 10.1037/xge0000596.
7
The Value of Electroencephalogram in Assessing Children With Speech and Language Impairments.脑电图在评估言语和语言障碍儿童中的价值。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jan 30;62(1):153-168. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0087.
8
The role of multisensory development in early language learning.多感官发展在早期语言学习中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;183:48-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
What does "engagement" mean in early speech pathology intervention? A qualitative systematised review.早期言语病理学干预中的“参与”是什么?一项定性系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Sep;42(18):2665-2678. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1563640. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
10
Caregivers' Perceptions of Their Child's Language Disorder: Alignment between Caregivers and Speech-Language Pathologists.照顾者对其子女语言障碍的认知:照顾者与言语语言病理学家之间的一致性。
Semin Speech Lang. 2018 Nov;39(5):427-442. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670671. Epub 2018 Sep 19.