Løseth Sissel, Stålberg Erik, Jorde Rolf, Mellgren Svein Ivar
Dept. of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø and University Hospital of North Norway, 9038, Tromsø, Norway.
J Neurol. 2008 Aug;255(8):1197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0872-0. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
To determine whether neuropathy in diabetic patients with normal nerve conduction studies could be detected by measurements of thermal thresholds and quantification of intraepidermal nerve fibre (IENF) density, and to evaluate differences in parameters between patients with and without neuropathic symptoms.
A total of 22 patients with and 37 patients without sensory symptoms suggesting distal neuropathy were included. Measurements of warm and cold perception thresholds and skin biopsy for quantification of IENFs were performed distally on the leg. Reference data were used to normalize test results for age and height or gender of individual patients by calculating the Z-scores.
IENF density was significantly reduced in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients compared to controls (p < 0.001), and in patients with symptoms compared to those without (p = 0.01). Thermal thresholds were significantly elevated (more abnormal) in patients with symptoms compared to controls (p < 0.01), but only for cold perception threshold (CPT) (p < 0.001) in the asymptomatic group. When comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, there was no statistically significant difference in thermal thresholds. Depletion of IENFs in skin biopsy was the most frequent abnormal finding in the subgroup of patients with neuropathic symptoms (36 %) followed by abnormal CPT (27 %).
Patients with diabetes and normal nerve conduction studies had significantly lower IENF density and higher CPT than controls, whether they had symptoms of polyneuropathy or not. In patients with neuropathic symptoms, abnormal IENF density predominated and seemed thus to be the most sensitive tool of detecting small diameter nerve fibre involvement.
通过测量热阈值和量化表皮内神经纤维(IENF)密度,确定神经传导研究正常的糖尿病患者是否可检测出神经病变,并评估有无神经病变症状患者之间参数的差异。
纳入22例有提示远端神经病变感觉症状的患者和37例无此类症状的患者。在腿部远端进行温觉和冷觉阈值测量以及用于IENF量化的皮肤活检。通过计算Z分数,使用参考数据将个体患者的年龄、身高或性别的测试结果标准化。
与对照组相比,有症状和无症状患者的IENF密度均显著降低(p < 0.001),有症状患者与无症状患者相比也是如此(p = 0.01)。与对照组相比,有症状患者的热阈值显著升高(更异常)(p < 0.01),但仅无症状组的冷觉阈值(CPT)显著升高(p < 0.001)。比较有症状和无症状患者时,热阈值无统计学显著差异。皮肤活检中IENF缺失是有神经病变症状患者亚组中最常见的异常发现(36%),其次是异常CPT(27%)。
无论有无多发性神经病变症状,神经传导研究正常的糖尿病患者的IENF密度均显著低于对照组,CPT则高于对照组。在有神经病变症状的患者中,IENF密度异常占主导,因此似乎是检测小直径神经纤维受累的最敏感工具。