Nebuchennykh Maria, Løseth Sissel, Lindal Sigurd, Mellgren Svein Ivar
Department of Neurology, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038 Tromsö, Norway.
J Neurol. 2009 Jul;256(7):1067-75. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5065-y. Epub 2009 Mar 1.
The primary aim of our study was to demonstrate how the diagnostic characteristics of skin biopsy used to evaluate small fiber involvement in patients with different causes of polyneuropathy are intrinsically related to the method used to establish the reference values (cut-off values). We also investigated intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and abnormalities in quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with different causes of polyneuropathy and signs of small fiber involvement. A total of 210 patients with symptoms and signs of polyneuropathy were entered into the study. All patients underwent neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, QST on the thigh and distal part of the calf with detection of warm and cold perception thresholds, and skin biopsy with assessment of IENF density. Cut-off values for IENF density were established from our reference material using Z-scores (calculated from multiple regression analysis), fifth percentile, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Of the patients participating in the study, 65 had an established diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, 70 were classified with idiopathic polyneuropathy, and 75 had other possible causes of polyneuropathy. Forty-five patients met the criteria for small fiber polyneuropathy (SFN), and the remaining 165 had also involvement of large nerve fibers. Of the total patient cohort, 84 (40%) had reduced IENF density based on the Z-score, and 106 patients (50%) had at least one abnormality based on QST. In the SFN group, skin biopsy showed a sensitivity of 31% and a specificity of 98% when reference values were presented with Z-scores. When the fifth percentile was used as the cut-off value (6.7 fibers/mm), sensitivity was 35% and specificity 95%. Applying the ROC analysis with a chosen sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 64%, we had a cut-off point of 10.3 fibers/mm. We conclude that skin biopsy with assessment of IENF is a useful method for investigating patients with SFN. The diagnostic value of the test, however, depends upon on the approach used to estimate the reference values.
我们研究的主要目的是证明,用于评估不同病因所致多发性神经病患者小纤维受累情况的皮肤活检诊断特征,如何与用于确定参考值(临界值)的方法存在内在关联。我们还研究了不同病因所致多发性神经病且有小纤维受累体征的患者的表皮内神经纤维(IENF)密度及定量感觉测试(QST)异常情况。共有210例有多发性神经病症状和体征的患者纳入本研究。所有患者均接受了神经系统检查、神经传导研究、大腿及小腿远端的QST以检测温觉和冷觉阈值,以及评估IENF密度的皮肤活检。IENF密度的临界值通过Z分数(由多元回归分析计算得出)、第五百分位数和受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,从我们的参考材料中确定。参与研究的患者中,65例已确诊为糖尿病,70例归类为特发性多发性神经病,75例有其他可能的多发性神经病病因。45例患者符合小纤维多发性神经病(SFN)标准,其余165例也有大神经纤维受累。在整个患者队列中,基于Z分数,84例(40%)IENF密度降低,106例患者(50%)基于QST至少有一项异常。在SFN组中,当参考值以Z分数表示时,皮肤活检显示敏感性为31%,特异性为98%。当以第五百分位数作为临界值(6.7条纤维/mm)时,敏感性为35%,特异性为95%。应用ROC分析,选择敏感性为78%、特异性为64%时,我们得到的临界值为10.3条纤维/mm。我们得出结论,评估IENF的皮肤活检是研究SFN患者的有用方法。然而,该检测的诊断价值取决于用于估计参考值的方法。