Msuya S E, Mbizvo E M, Hussain A, Uriyo J, Sam N E, Stray-Pedersen B
Department of International Health, University of Oslo, Norway.
AIDS Care. 2008 Jul;20(6):700-9. doi: 10.1080/09540120701687059.
This study aimed to describe the prevalence and predictors for male partner participation in HIV voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) at two primary healthcare clinics in Moshi urban, Tanzania as well as the effect of partner participation on uptake of HIV perinatal interventions. Pregnant women (n = 2654) in their third trimester, participating in a prevention of mother to child tranmission (PMTCT) program between June 2002 and March 2004 were encouraged to inform and invite their partners for HIV-VCT. Trained nurses conducted pre-test counselling, interviews, clinical examinations and blood sampling from the participating women and their partners. Test results were presented and post-test counselling was conducted individually or in couples, depending on the wishes of the participants. Three-hundred-and-thirty-two male partners (12.5%) came for HIV-VCT. A high proportion (131; 40%) came after the woman had delivered. HIV-seropositive women whose partners attended were three times more likely to use Nevirapine prophylaxis, four times more likely to avoid breastfeeding and six times more likely to adhere to the infant feeding method selected than those whose partners didn't attend. Women were more likely to bring their partner for VCT if they collected their own test results, were living with their partner, had a high monthly income and had expressed at enrolment the intention to share HIV results with their partner. Although PMTCT programs are presumably a good entry point for male involvement in prevention of sexual and perinatal HIV transmission, this traditional clinic-based approach reaches few men. Given the positive influence male participation has on the acceptance of perinatal interventions, a different approach for promoting male participation in VCT is urgently required. Within PMTCT programs, counseling should emphasize the advantages of partner participation to encourage women to inform and convince male partners to come for VCT. Also, promotion of couple VCT outside antenatal settings in male friendly and accessible settings should be given priority.
本研究旨在描述坦桑尼亚莫希市城区两家初级保健诊所男性伴侣参与艾滋病毒自愿咨询和检测(VCT)的患病率及预测因素,以及伴侣参与对艾滋病毒围产期干预措施采用情况的影响。2002年6月至2004年3月期间,鼓励参与预防母婴传播(PMTCT)项目的孕晚期孕妇(n = 2654)告知并邀请其伴侣进行艾滋病毒VCT。经过培训的护士为参与的女性及其伴侣进行检测前咨询、访谈、临床检查和血液采样。根据参与者的意愿,单独或夫妻一起公布检测结果并进行检测后咨询。332名男性伴侣(12.5%)前来进行艾滋病毒VCT。很大一部分(131名;40%)是在女性分娩后来的。伴侣前来参与的艾滋病毒血清阳性女性使用奈韦拉平预防用药的可能性是伴侣未参与的女性的三倍,避免母乳喂养的可能性是其四倍,坚持所选择的婴儿喂养方式的可能性是其六倍。如果女性自己领取检测结果、与伴侣同住、月收入高且在登记时表示打算与伴侣分享艾滋病毒检测结果,那么她们更有可能带伴侣来进行VCT。尽管PMTCT项目大概是男性参与预防性传播和围产期艾滋病毒传播的一个良好切入点,但这种传统的基于诊所的方法惠及的男性很少。鉴于男性参与对围产期干预措施的接受有积极影响,迫切需要一种不同的方法来促进男性参与VCT。在PMTCT项目中,咨询应强调伴侣参与的好处,以鼓励女性告知并说服男性伴侣前来进行VCT。此外,应优先在对男性友好且方便前往的场所开展产前检查之外的夫妻VCT推广活动。