相似文献
1
Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors.
PLoS Med. 2008 Jun 24;5(6):e139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139.
2
A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research.
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jan 10;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-10.
3
The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Oct;50(10):723. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03107.x.
4
Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices.
PLoS Med. 2010 Aug;8(8):e1001069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001069. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
5
Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers.
CMAJ. 1996 Jun 1;154(11):1695-704.
6
[Adherence to research reporting guidelines in biomedical journals in Latin America and the Caribbean].
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Oct;36(4):232-7.
7
Reporting clinical research: guidance to encourage accurate and transparent research reporting.
Maturitas. 2012 May;72(1):84-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol.
Syst Rev. 2012 May 24;1:24. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-24.
9
[Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):665-675. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300025.
10
Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
J Wound Care. 2004 Mar;13(3):103-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.3.26593.
引用本文的文献
1
The Tryptophan-Kynurenine pathway in people living with HIV: a systematic review.
Infection. 2025 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02557-1.
2
Literature reviews: typology and forensic applications.
Int J Legal Med. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03514-1.
3
Reporting quality of animal research in journals that published the ARRIVE 1.0 or ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines: a cross-sectional analysis of 943 studies.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024 Dec 31;14(6):1070-1082. doi: 10.21037/cdt-24-413. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
4
A Commitment to Quality in Musculoskeletal Research Reporting.
HSS J. 2024 Nov;20(4):462-463. doi: 10.1177/15563316241290832. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
5
Evaluating Compliance of Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts in Plastic Surgery Journals with CONSORT Guidelines Using GPT-4 AI.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Oct 11;12(10):e6227. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006227. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
The reporting quality of meta-epidemiological studies needs substantial improvement: a research on research study.
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 28;13(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02661-7.
7
Evolution of Research Reporting Standards: Adapting to the Influence of Artificial Intelligence, Statistics Software, and Writing Tools.
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 19;39(32):e231. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e231.
8
Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):CD013606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013606.pub2.
9
CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII.
Insights Imaging. 2023 May 4;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8.
10
Consensus Head Acceleration Measurement Practices (CHAMP): Origins, Methods, Transparency and Disclosure.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2022 Nov;50(11):1317-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03025-9. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
本文引用的文献
1
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD.
2
The ORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of outbreak reports and intervention studies of nosocomial infection.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;7(4):282-8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70082-8.
3
"Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):421-9, e205.
4
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
Neurology. 2006 Sep 12;67(5):792-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238386.41398.30.
5
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.
Med J Aust. 2006 Sep 4;185(5):263-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x.
6
Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting.
BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):413. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38895.467130.55. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
7
Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):427-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010.
8
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1152-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1152.
9
Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 7;144(5):364-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013.
10
GNOSIS: guidelines for neuro-oncology: standards for investigational studies-reporting of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials.
Neuro Oncol. 2005 Oct;7(4):425-34. doi: 10.1215/S1152851705000554.
Zotero 插件