Shehata Atef S, Mukherjee Pranab K, Aboulatta Hassan N, el-Akhras Atef I, Abbadi Said H, Ghannoum Mahmoud A
Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Aug;46(8):2641-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00697-08. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
Dermatophytes are fungi that belong to three genera: Epidermophyton, Microsporum, and Trichophyton. Identification of dermatophyte species is essential for appropriate diagnosis and treatment of dermatophytosis. Routine identification depends on macroscopic and microscopic morphology, which is time-consuming and does not identify dermatophyte strains. In this study, two PCR-based methods were compared for their abilities to identify 21 dermatophyte isolates obtained from Egyptian patients to the species and strain levels. The first method employed a two-step method: PCR amplification, using ITS1 and ITS4 as primers, followed by restriction enzyme digestion using the endonuclease MvaI. The second method employed a one-step approach employing the repetitive oligonucleotide (GACA)(4) as a primer. Dermatophyte strains were also identified using a conventional culture method. Our results showed that the conventional culture method identified four species: Microsporum canis, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, and Trichophyton violaceum. Moreover, both PCR methods agreed with the diagnosis made using the conventional approach. Furthermore, ITS1/ITS4-based PCR provided no strain differentiation, while (GACA)(4)-based PCR identified different varieties among the T. mentagrophytes isolates. Taken together, our results suggest that (GACA)(4)-based PCR has utility as a simple and rapid method for identification of dermatophyte species as well as utility for differentiation of T. mentagrophytes variants.
表皮癣菌属、小孢子菌属和毛癣菌属。皮肤癣菌种类的鉴定对于皮肤癣菌病的正确诊断和治疗至关重要。常规鉴定依赖于宏观和微观形态学,这既耗时又无法鉴定皮肤癣菌菌株。在本研究中,比较了两种基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的方法,以确定从埃及患者分离出的21株皮肤癣菌在种和菌株水平上的鉴定能力。第一种方法采用两步法:以ITS1和ITS4为引物进行PCR扩增,随后使用内切酶MvaI进行限制性酶切。第二种方法采用一步法,使用重复寡核苷酸(GACA)(4)作为引物。皮肤癣菌菌株也使用传统培养方法进行鉴定。我们的结果表明,传统培养方法鉴定出了四种菌种:犬小孢子菌、须癣毛癣菌、红色毛癣菌和紫色毛癣菌。此外,两种PCR方法与使用传统方法做出的诊断结果一致。此外,基于ITS1/ITS4的PCR未提供菌株区分,而基于(GACA)(4)的PCR在须癣毛癣菌分离株中鉴定出了不同的变种。综上所述,我们的结果表明,基于(GACA)(4)的PCR作为一种简单快速的皮肤癣菌种类鉴定方法具有实用性,同时对于区分须癣毛癣菌变种也具有实用性。