Baker Patricia, Oliva Esther
Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008 Jul;27(3):353-65. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31815c24fe.
The use of frozen section in gynecological pathology has not been emphasized in the literature to the same degree as in other surgical fields. This review focuses on the indications, contraindications, and limitations of frozen-section diagnosis specific to the female genital tract. An intraoperative consultation in gynecological pathology is indicated (a) to ensure that the tissue sampled is adequate for diagnosis, (b) to determine the nature of a disease process, (c) to plan for appropriate ancillary studies, (d) to determine tumor spread, and (e) to assess the margins. In the ovary, mucinous tumors in particular may present a challenge and potential for misdiagnosis at the time of frozen section. It is important to determine the nature of the ovarian involvement, as tumor size greater than 10 cm or bilateral involvement strongly suggests a metastatic process. Also, the distinction between ovarian carcinoma and tumors of borderline malignancy may be difficult in a limited sampling. In the germ cell category, an important distinction is that of a dysgerminoma from a large cell lymphoma, due to different treatment regimes. Pregnant and postpartum women present a unique challenge as the effects of high levels of pregnancy-related hormones may result in lesions that closely mimic malignancy. Although intraoperative frozen section should be discouraged as a primary diagnostic procedure for endometrial carcinoma, it can be very helpful to identify those patients who are at risk for extrauterine spread and who may require lymphadenectomy. Analysis of a cone biopsy of the cervix by frozen section may be warranted particularly if the previous biopsy showed equivocal stromal invasion, an uncertain depth of invasion, there are issues related to fertility; however, the process is time consuming and may compromise the permanent sections if the lesion is very small. Frozen-section diagnosis in squamous cell carcinoma and in Paget disease of the vulva is infrequently requested as these entities are multifocal resulting in an inaccurate frozen-section diagnosis. Lastly, intraoperative evaluation of lymph nodes including the role of sentinel lymph nodes is discussed.
妇科病理学中冰冻切片的应用在文献中的强调程度不及其他外科领域。本综述聚焦于女性生殖道特异性冰冻切片诊断的适应证、禁忌证及局限性。妇科病理学术中会诊适用于:(a)确保所取组织足以用于诊断;(b)确定疾病过程的性质;(c)规划合适的辅助检查;(d)确定肿瘤扩散情况;(e)评估切缘。在卵巢,尤其是黏液性肿瘤在冰冻切片时可能带来挑战及误诊风险。确定卵巢受累的性质很重要,因为肿瘤直径大于10 cm或双侧受累强烈提示转移过程。此外,在有限取材情况下,卵巢癌与交界性恶性肿瘤的鉴别可能困难。在生殖细胞类别中,由于治疗方案不同,未成熟畸胎瘤与大细胞淋巴瘤的鉴别很重要。妊娠和产后女性带来独特挑战,因为高水平妊娠相关激素的影响可能导致酷似恶性肿瘤的病变。虽然应不鼓励将术中冰冻切片作为子宫内膜癌的主要诊断方法,但对于识别有宫外扩散风险且可能需要行淋巴结切除术的患者可能非常有帮助。尤其在先前活检显示间质浸润不明确、浸润深度不确定或存在生育相关问题时,对宫颈锥形活检进行冰冻切片分析可能是必要的;然而,该过程耗时,如果病变非常小,可能会影响永久切片。外阴鳞状细胞癌和佩吉特病很少要求进行冰冻切片诊断,因为这些病变多灶性分布,会导致冰冻切片诊断不准确。最后,讨论了术中淋巴结评估,包括前哨淋巴结的作用。