Martínez-Dolz Luis, Almenar Luis, Hervás Isabel, Moro José, Agüero Jaime, Sánchez-Lázaro Ignacio, Mateo Antonio, Salvador Antonio
Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jul;27(7):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
Persistent elevation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in the first year after transplant appears to be associated with an adverse prognosis. However, there are no data on the prognostic value of two serial determinations of BNP at the end of the first year after transplant in clinically stable patients.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between the increase in two serial determinations of BNP at the end of the first year and the subsequent development of events in medium-long-term follow-up.
An observational study was conducted in a consecutive series of 71 patients transplanted between January 1999 and January 2001. Patients who were "unstable" or had other conditions that could elevate BNP levels (rejection, elevated pulmonary pressures, renal dysfunction, depressed ventricular function or severe graft vascular disease) were also excluded. The final number of patients included was 51. BNP determinations were performed at 9 and 12 months post-transplant at the same time as biopsies. Three groups were formed depending on the relationship between the two determinations: Group 1 (20 patients), decrease >20%; Group 2 (16 patients), change <20%; and Group 3 (15 patients), increase >20%. The following were considered events: death; late rejection; and ventricular dysfunction associated or not with graft vascular disease.
The baseline clinical profile was similar in the three groups. There was a significant difference in the rate of events (Group 1, 10%; Group 2, 32%; Group 3, 53%; p < 0.017). Event-free survival was statistically different between the groups (p = 0.017), mainly because of the large difference between Groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.003). Thus, cumulative event-free survival at 3,000 days was 89.4% for Group 1, 68.3% for Group 2 and 48.2% for Group 3.
The increase between two serial determinations of BNP levels at the end of the first year post-transplant could identify a subgroup of patients with poor outcome.
移植后第一年B型利钠肽(BNP)水平持续升高似乎与不良预后相关。然而,对于临床稳定的患者,在移植后第一年末进行两次连续BNP测定的预后价值尚无相关数据。
本研究旨在分析移植后第一年末两次连续BNP测定值升高与中长期随访中后续事件发生之间的关联。
对1999年1月至2001年1月间连续移植的71例患者进行了一项观察性研究。排除了“不稳定”或有其他可能升高BNP水平的情况(排斥反应、肺压力升高、肾功能不全、心室功能减退或严重移植血管疾病)的患者。最终纳入患者51例。在移植后9个月和12个月与活检同时进行BNP测定。根据两次测定结果之间的关系分为三组:第1组(20例患者),下降>20%;第2组(16例患者),变化<20%;第3组(15例患者),升高>20%。以下情况被视为事件:死亡;晚期排斥反应;与移植血管疾病相关或不相关的心室功能障碍。
三组患者的基线临床特征相似。事件发生率存在显著差异(第1组,10%;第2组,32%;第3组,53%;p<0.017)。各组间无事件生存存在统计学差异(p=0.017),主要是因为第1组和第3组之间差异较大(p=0.003)。因此,第1组在3000天时的累积无事件生存率为89.4%,第2组为68.3%,第3组为48.2%。
移植后第一年末两次连续BNP水平测定值的升高可识别出预后不良的患者亚组。