Suppr超能文献

欧洲器官移植学会(ESOT)关于使用非侵入性生物标志物进行心胸器官移植排斥监测的共识声明。

European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance.

机构信息

Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation (GRAfT) and Laboratory of Applied Precision Omics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2024 Jun 11;37:12445. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12445. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field's incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.

摘要

虽然同种异体移植排斥(AR)仍然威胁着心胸器官移植的成功,但缺乏准确且可重复的监测工具来诊断 AR,这是心胸器官移植受者临床管理中的一个主要未满足的需求。自该领域开始以来,心肌内膜活检(EMB)和经支气管活检(TBBx)一直是排斥监测的基石,但两者都存在明显的局限性,包括病理学家之间的活检解释一致性差。近年来,出现了用于 AR 监测的新型分子工具,并且已经在多项研究中评估了它们的性能特征。ESOT 召集的一个国际工作组审查了现有文献,并提出了一系列建议,以指导这些生物标志物在临床实践中的使用。尽管存在一些注意事项,但该工作组认识到,基因表达谱和供体游离 DNA(dd-cfDNA)可用于排除心脏移植受者的排斥反应,但不建议用于筛查心脏同种异体血管病。其他传统的生物标志物(NT-proBNP、BNP 或肌钙蛋白)没有足够的证据支持其用于诊断 AR。关于肺移植,dd-cfDNA 可用于排除临床排斥和感染,但不建议用于监测治疗反应。

相似文献

4
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
Sex and gender as predictors for allograft and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD014966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014966.pub2.
8
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(3):1-46.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular diagnostics for the monitoring of the cardiac allograft.
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 25;10:100354. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100354. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Clinical relevance and outcome of routine endomyocardial biopsy to detect rejection after heart transplantation.
JHLT Open. 2025 Jun 14;9:100320. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100320. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Using a combination of biomarkers to monitor allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients.
Front Transplant. 2025 May 8;4:1574898. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2025.1574898. eCollection 2025.
6
2024: A Year in Review.
Transpl Int. 2025 Jan 14;37:14243. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.14243. eCollection 2024.
7
Donor-derived cell-free DNA in chronic lung allograft dysfunction phenotypes: a pilot study.
Front Transplant. 2024 Dec 23;3:1513101. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1513101. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 May;42(5):e1-e141. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System: Assessment of Rejection and Injury in Heart Transplant Biopsies.
Transplantation. 2023 Jan 1;107(1):27-44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004323. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Circulating microRNAs in cellular and antibody-mediated heart transplant rejection.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Oct;41(10):1401-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.06.019. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
Validation of a Simple, Rapid, and Cost-Effective Method for Acute Rejection Monitoring in Lung Transplant Recipients.
Transpl Int. 2022 Jun 9;35:10546. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10546. eCollection 2022.
7
Elevated cell-free DNA in respiratory viral infection and associated lung allograft dysfunction.
Am J Transplant. 2022 Nov;22(11):2560-2570. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17125. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Rejection Surveillance After Cardiac Transplantation.
Circulation. 2022 Jun 21;145(25):1811-1824. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057006. Epub 2022 May 27.
9
A novel donor-derived cell-free DNA assay for the detection of acute rejection in heart transplantation.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Jul;41(7):919-927. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验