Hellstern Peter
Institute of Hemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Academic City Hospital, Bremserstrasse 79, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2008 Aug;39(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
Three types of therapeutic plasma are available that differ in their manufacturing processes, composition, clinical efficacy, and side effects. Quarantine-stored, not pathogen-reduced fresh-frozen plasma (QFFP) is prepared from single whole blood or plasma donations. The manufacture of pathogen-reduced single-donor plasmas such as methylene blue-light treated (MLP) or amotosalen-ultraviolet light treated plasma (ALP) involves the addition of a chemical followed by irradiation and subsequent removal of the chemical. Both plasma types show substantial fluctuation of clotting factor and inhibitor levels according to interindividual variations, and both carry the risk of inducing transfusion-associated lung injury (TRALI). Photo-oxidation in pathogen-reduced single-donor plasmas reduces clottable fibrinogen and other clotting factors markedly, and there is a lack of clear evidence showing whether this is harmful or not. MLP also appears to be less effective clinically than QFFP. Like clotting factor or inhibitor concentrates, solvent/detergent-treated plasmas (SDP) are bio-pharmaceutical preparations derived from large plasma pools, and variations in plasma protein levels from batch-to-batch are for that reason low. The SD manufacturing process inevitably involves a considerable reduction of plasmin inhibitor (PI), and moderate reduction of all other clotting factors and inhibitors in the final plasma bags. Clinical studies and broad clinical use have however shown that this does not significantly reduce clinical efficacy or increase adverse events. SDPs obviously do not induce TRALI and the risk of allergic reactions is significantly lower than for QFFP. Common to all three plasma types is that the time between donation and freezing the plasma, and whether plasma from whole blood or apheresis plasma is used as starting material, are decisive determinants for the clotting factor and inhibitor potencies in the final bags. Plasma frozen 3-6h after donation, and apheresis plasma, contain markedly greater amounts of clotting factors and inhibitors than plasma frozen 15-24h after collection or plasma from whole blood. Lyophilisation and the pooling of single-donor plasma units with ABO blood group in suitable proportions (Uniplas) facilitate SDP handling and logistics without loss of clinical efficacy. SDP is obviously at least as cost-effective as QFFP if non-infectious adverse events including TRALI are taken into account, at least in younger patients and patients with good prognosis.
有三种治疗性血浆,它们在制造工艺、成分、临床疗效和副作用方面存在差异。检疫储存的、未进行病原体灭活的新鲜冷冻血浆(QFFP)由单次全血或血浆捐献制备。病原体灭活的单供体血浆,如亚甲蓝光处理血浆(MLP)或氨甲环酸-紫外线处理血浆(ALP)的制造过程包括添加一种化学物质,然后进行照射,随后去除该化学物质。这两种血浆类型的凝血因子和抑制剂水平都会因个体差异而出现大幅波动,并且都有引发输血相关肺损伤(TRALI)的风险。病原体灭活的单供体血浆中的光氧化作用会显著降低可凝结的纤维蛋白原和其他凝血因子,目前缺乏明确证据表明这是否有害。MLP在临床上似乎也不如QFFP有效。与凝血因子或抑制剂浓缩物一样,溶剂/去污剂处理血浆(SDP)是源自大量血浆库的生物制药制剂,因此批次间血浆蛋白水平的差异较小。SD制造工艺不可避免地会导致纤溶酶抑制剂(PI)大幅减少,最终血浆袋中所有其他凝血因子和抑制剂也会适度减少。然而,临床研究和广泛的临床应用表明,这并不会显著降低临床疗效或增加不良事件。SDP显然不会引发TRALI,且过敏反应的风险明显低于QFFP。所有这三种血浆类型的共同之处在于,从献血到冷冻血浆的时间,以及使用全血血浆还是单采血浆作为起始原料,是最终袋子中凝血因子和抑制剂效力的决定性因素。献血后3 - 6小时冷冻的血浆以及单采血浆,其凝血因子和抑制剂的含量明显高于采集后15 - 24小时冷冻的血浆或全血血浆。冻干以及将单供体血浆单位按适当比例与ABO血型混合(Uniplas)有助于SDP的处理和物流,且不会损失临床疗效。如果考虑到包括TRALI在内的非感染性不良事件,至少在年轻患者和预后良好的患者中,SDP显然至少与QFFP一样具有成本效益。