Kelly Anne-Maree, Kerr Debra, Clooney Megan
Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, St. Albans, VIC, Australia.
Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, St. Albans, VIC, Australia.
Chest. 2008 Nov;134(5):1033-1036. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0910. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
International guidelines for the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) vary, and there is growing opinion that more patients could be successfully managed with observation alone. There is little published evidence detailing the outcomes of emergency department (ED) patients who have been treated for PSP. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes for patients with PSP.
This was a retrospective cohort study that was conducted by explicit medical record review that investigated adult patients with PSP who had been treated at two urban teaching hospital EDs from 1996 to 2005. The data collected included demographics, clinical data at presentation, and outcome data. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients who were successfully treated with the initial management strategy (ie, conservative, aspiration, and tube thoracostomy). Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics.
A total of 203 episodes of PSP in 154 patients (70% male; median age, 24 years) was identified. PSP size ranged from 5 to 100%. Ninety-one PSP patients (45%) were treated with outpatient observation, 48 patients (24%) were treated with aspiration, and 64 patients (31%) were treated with tube thoracostomy. In total, the conditions of 79% of patients (82 of 91 patients) who were treated with observation resolved without additional intervention. Aspiration was successful in 50% of cases (24 of 48 cases) where it was attempted; the conditions of 73% of PSP patients who were treated with tube thoracostomy (47 of 64) resolved without additional intervention.
These data suggest that observation alone is an effective initial treatment strategy for selected patients with PSP. They support the inclusion of an observation arm in planned prospective studies comparing different management approaches.
原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的国际管理指南各不相同,并且越来越多的人认为更多患者仅通过观察就能成功治疗。很少有已发表的证据详细说明接受PSP治疗的急诊科(ED)患者的治疗结果。本研究的目的是描述PSP患者的临床结局。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,通过明确的病历审查进行,调查了1996年至2005年在两家城市教学医院急诊科接受治疗的成年PSP患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学、就诊时的临床数据和结局数据。感兴趣的结局是采用初始管理策略(即保守治疗、穿刺抽吸和胸腔闭式引流)成功治疗的患者比例。使用描述性统计进行数据分析。
共识别出154例患者的203次PSP发作(男性占70%;中位年龄24岁)。PSP大小范围为5%至100%。91例PSP患者(45%)接受门诊观察治疗,48例患者(24%)接受穿刺抽吸治疗,64例患者(31%)接受胸腔闭式引流治疗。总体而言,接受观察治疗的患者中有79%(91例中的82例)的病情在无需额外干预的情况下得到缓解。穿刺抽吸在50%(48例中的24例)尝试的病例中成功;接受胸腔闭式引流治疗的PSP患者中有73%(64例中的47例)的病情在无需额外干预的情况下得到缓解。
这些数据表明,对于部分PSP患者,仅观察是一种有效的初始治疗策略。它们支持在比较不同管理方法的计划前瞻性研究中纳入观察组。