Martínek Jan, Benes Marek, Hucl Tomás, Drastich Pavel, Stirand Petr, Spicák Julius
Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(7):794-800. doi: 10.1080/00365520801908928.
To investigate whether gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with mild to moderate erosive esophagitis (ERD) is a more severe disease regarding the amount of acid reflux, motor abnormalities, and the presence/absence of hiatus hernia than non-erosive reflux disease (NERD).
The study comprised a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 313 consecutive subjects referred for endoscopy, pH-metry, and esophageal manometry. The patients were divided into four groups: Group I (n=92), subjects without GERD with normal pH-metry, without esophagitis and without reflux symptoms; Group II (n=111), patients with NERD (no esophagitis, abnormal pH-metry); Group III (n=77), patients with mild to moderate ERD (LA A, B; abnormal pH-metry); Group IV (n=33), patients with severe or complicated esophagitis (LA C, D; Barrett's esophagus). All data are expressed as medians with 5th-95th percentiles.
No difference was found in the amount of acid reflux between patients with mild to moderate ERD and those with NERD. The DeMeester score was 34.5 (17-105) in NERD patients and 31.6 (15-102) in ERD patients. No significant differences were found between NERD and ERD patients regarding lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure (11.6 mmHg; 3-25 in NERD versus 10.7 mmHg; 3-22 in ERD). Similar proportions of patients with NERD and ERD had low LES basal pressure (20.7% in NERD versus 24.7% in ERD; NS) and hiatus hernia (44% and 56%; NS). A relatively high proportion of patients without GERD (Group I) had ineffective esophageal motility (39%) and hiatus hernia (30%).
No difference was found between NERD and mild to moderate ERD in terms of acid exposure time and esophageal motor abnormalities. To a certain extent, ERD is a "more complicated" form of the disease. Host factors related to a particular patient (e.g. mucosal defense, genetics, acid clearance) might be responsible for the development of esophagitis.
研究与非糜烂性反流病(NERD)相比,伴有轻至中度糜烂性食管炎(ERD)的胃食管反流病(GERD)在酸反流量、运动功能异常以及是否存在食管裂孔疝方面是否为更严重的疾病。
本研究对前瞻性收集的313例连续接受内镜检查、pH监测和食管测压的患者数据进行回顾性分析。患者分为四组:第一组(n = 92),pH监测正常、无食管炎且无反流症状的无GERD患者;第二组(n = 111),NERD患者(无食管炎,pH监测异常);第三组(n = 77),轻至中度ERD患者(洛杉矶分级A、B级;pH监测异常);第四组(n = 33),重度或复杂性食管炎患者(洛杉矶分级C、D级;巴雷特食管)。所有数据均以第5至95百分位数的中位数表示。
轻至中度ERD患者与NERD患者在酸反流量方面未发现差异。NERD患者的DeMeester评分为34.5(17 - 105),ERD患者为31.6(15 - 102)。NERD和ERD患者在食管下括约肌(LES)基础压力方面未发现显著差异(NERD为11.6 mmHg;3 - 25,ERD为10.7 mmHg;3 - 22)。NERD和ERD患者中LES基础压力低的比例相似(NERD为20.7%,ERD为24.7%;无统计学差异),食管裂孔疝的比例也相似(分别为44%和56%;无统计学差异)。无GERD的患者(第一组)中,食管运动功能无效的比例相对较高(39%),食管裂孔疝的比例也较高(30%)。
NERD与轻至中度ERD在酸暴露时间和食管运动功能异常方面未发现差异。在一定程度上,ERD是该疾病的一种“更复杂”形式。与特定患者相关的宿主因素(如黏膜防御、遗传学、酸清除)可能是食管炎发生的原因。