Suppr超能文献

非糜烂性和糜烂性胃食管反流病:在反流模式和动力异常方面无差异。

Non-erosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux diseases: No difference with regard to reflux pattern and motility abnormalities.

作者信息

Martínek Jan, Benes Marek, Hucl Tomás, Drastich Pavel, Stirand Petr, Spicák Julius

机构信息

Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(7):794-800. doi: 10.1080/00365520801908928.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with mild to moderate erosive esophagitis (ERD) is a more severe disease regarding the amount of acid reflux, motor abnormalities, and the presence/absence of hiatus hernia than non-erosive reflux disease (NERD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study comprised a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 313 consecutive subjects referred for endoscopy, pH-metry, and esophageal manometry. The patients were divided into four groups: Group I (n=92), subjects without GERD with normal pH-metry, without esophagitis and without reflux symptoms; Group II (n=111), patients with NERD (no esophagitis, abnormal pH-metry); Group III (n=77), patients with mild to moderate ERD (LA A, B; abnormal pH-metry); Group IV (n=33), patients with severe or complicated esophagitis (LA C, D; Barrett's esophagus). All data are expressed as medians with 5th-95th percentiles.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the amount of acid reflux between patients with mild to moderate ERD and those with NERD. The DeMeester score was 34.5 (17-105) in NERD patients and 31.6 (15-102) in ERD patients. No significant differences were found between NERD and ERD patients regarding lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure (11.6 mmHg; 3-25 in NERD versus 10.7 mmHg; 3-22 in ERD). Similar proportions of patients with NERD and ERD had low LES basal pressure (20.7% in NERD versus 24.7% in ERD; NS) and hiatus hernia (44% and 56%; NS). A relatively high proportion of patients without GERD (Group I) had ineffective esophageal motility (39%) and hiatus hernia (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was found between NERD and mild to moderate ERD in terms of acid exposure time and esophageal motor abnormalities. To a certain extent, ERD is a "more complicated" form of the disease. Host factors related to a particular patient (e.g. mucosal defense, genetics, acid clearance) might be responsible for the development of esophagitis.

摘要

目的

研究与非糜烂性反流病(NERD)相比,伴有轻至中度糜烂性食管炎(ERD)的胃食管反流病(GERD)在酸反流量、运动功能异常以及是否存在食管裂孔疝方面是否为更严重的疾病。

材料与方法

本研究对前瞻性收集的313例连续接受内镜检查、pH监测和食管测压的患者数据进行回顾性分析。患者分为四组:第一组(n = 92),pH监测正常、无食管炎且无反流症状的无GERD患者;第二组(n = 111),NERD患者(无食管炎,pH监测异常);第三组(n = 77),轻至中度ERD患者(洛杉矶分级A、B级;pH监测异常);第四组(n = 33),重度或复杂性食管炎患者(洛杉矶分级C、D级;巴雷特食管)。所有数据均以第5至95百分位数的中位数表示。

结果

轻至中度ERD患者与NERD患者在酸反流量方面未发现差异。NERD患者的DeMeester评分为34.5(17 - 105),ERD患者为31.6(15 - 102)。NERD和ERD患者在食管下括约肌(LES)基础压力方面未发现显著差异(NERD为11.6 mmHg;3 - 25,ERD为10.7 mmHg;3 - 22)。NERD和ERD患者中LES基础压力低的比例相似(NERD为20.7%,ERD为24.7%;无统计学差异),食管裂孔疝的比例也相似(分别为44%和56%;无统计学差异)。无GERD的患者(第一组)中,食管运动功能无效的比例相对较高(39%),食管裂孔疝的比例也较高(30%)。

结论

NERD与轻至中度ERD在酸暴露时间和食管运动功能异常方面未发现差异。在一定程度上,ERD是该疾病的一种“更复杂”形式。与特定患者相关的宿主因素(如黏膜防御、遗传学、酸清除)可能是食管炎发生的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验