Suppr超能文献

在冠状动脉经桡动脉支架置入术后随机早期出院(EASY)研究中,仅使用阿昔单抗推注与阿昔单抗推注加12小时输注的一年临床结局比较。

One-year clinical outcome after abciximab bolus-only compared with abciximab bolus and 12-hour infusion in the Randomized EArly Discharge after Transradial Stenting of CoronarY Arteries (EASY) Study.

作者信息

Bertrand Olivier F, Rodés-Cabau Josep, Larose Eric, Nguyen Can Manh, Roy Louis, Déry Jean-Pierre, Courtis Javier, Nault Isabelle, Poirier Paul, Costerousse Olivier, De Larochellière Robert

机构信息

Hôpital Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2008 Jul;156(1):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term clinical follow-up has shown a significant benefit after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for abciximab bolus followed by 12-hour infusion over placebo or bolus-only. With contemporary techniques and clopidogrel pretreatment, it is unknown whether the 12-hour infusion is still associated with a clinical benefit. The purpose of this study is to compare 6- and 12-month clinical outcomes in patients treated after PCI with abciximab bolus-only and abciximab bolus followed by 12-hour infusion.

METHODS

After a bolus of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg) and uncomplicated transradial coronary stenting, 1,005 patients were randomized either to same-day discharge and no infusion of abciximab (bolus-only group, n = 504) or to overnight hospitalization and 12 hours (0.125 microg/[kg min]) of abciximab infusion (bolus + infusion group, n = 501). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was evaluated at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

At 30 days, the rate of MACE including death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization was similar in the 2 groups: 1.4% in the bolus-only group versus 1.8% in the bolus + infusion group (P = .63). At 6 months, the MACE rate was 5.6% in the 2 randomized groups. At 12 months, the MACE rate was also similar in both groups: 8.7% in the bolus-only group and 9.2% in the bolus + infusion group (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.79-1.20, P = .80). Similar efficacy was also observed in several subgroups including higher-risk patients such as those with elevated troponin T before PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients pretreated with clopidogrel and undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery stenting, there is no difference in the 6- and 12-month outcomes between patients treated with abciximab bolus-only versus those treated with bolus + infusion, a finding consistent with the initial 30-day outcomes.

摘要

背景

长期临床随访显示,与安慰剂或仅给予推注相比,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时先给予阿昔单抗推注然后持续输注12小时具有显著益处。采用当代技术并进行氯吡格雷预处理后,尚不清楚12小时输注是否仍具有临床益处。本研究旨在比较PCI术后仅接受阿昔单抗推注治疗的患者与接受阿昔单抗推注后再持续输注12小时治疗的患者6个月和12个月时的临床结局。

方法

在给予阿昔单抗推注(0.25mg/kg)且经桡动脉冠状动脉支架置入术无并发症后,1005例患者被随机分为当日出院且不再输注阿昔单抗组(仅推注组,n = 504)或过夜住院并接受12小时(0.125μg/[kg·min])阿昔单抗输注组(推注+输注组,n = 501)。在30天、6个月和12个月时评估主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率。

结果

在30天时,两组的MACE发生率(包括死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建)相似:仅推注组为1.4%,推注+输注组为1.8%(P = 0.63)。在6个月时,两个随机分组的MACE发生率均为5.6%。在12个月时,两组的MACE发生率也相似:仅推注组为8.7%,推注+输注组为9.2%(风险比0.97,95%CI 0.79 - 1.20,P = 0.80)。在包括PCI术前肌钙蛋白T升高的高危患者在内的几个亚组中也观察到了相似的疗效。

结论

在接受氯吡格雷预处理且冠状动脉支架置入术无并发症的患者中,仅接受阿昔单抗推注治疗的患者与接受推注+输注治疗的患者在6个月和12个月时的结局无差异,这一结果与最初30天的结局一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验