• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建中使用腘绳肌自体移植物时生物可吸收与钛合金干涉螺钉的比较:一项为期2年随访的前瞻性随机试验。

Bioabsorbable versus titanium interference screws with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up.

作者信息

Myers Peter, Logan Martin, Stokes Andy, Boyd Kevin, Watts Mark

机构信息

Brisbane Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):817-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.011
PMID:18589271
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the outcome of hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by use of identically shaped bioabsorbable and titanium interference screws in a randomized trial.

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomized to have either bioabsorbable or titanium interference screws used for graft tunnel fixation in hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction. Patients were objectively and subjectively assessed preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Radiographs at 12 months postoperatively were also assessed for tunnel width.

RESULTS

There were no differences in clinical outcome by use of Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores between the 2 groups at any stage of follow-up to 2 years. Tibial tunnel widths were the same between the 2 groups. There was slightly more tunnel widening in the femur when bioabsorbable interference screws were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Identically shaped bioabsorbable interference screws and titanium interference screws used for hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction are equally successful up to 2 years postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized trial with more than 80% follow-up.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是在一项随机试验中,前瞻性地评估使用形状相同的生物可吸收螺钉和钛合金干涉螺钉进行自体腘绳肌腱前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的结果。

方法

100例患者被随机分为两组,分别在自体腘绳肌腱ACL重建中使用生物可吸收螺钉或钛合金干涉螺钉进行移植物隧道固定。在术前以及术后3、6、12和24个月对患者进行客观和主观评估。术后12个月时还对X线片进行隧道宽度评估。

结果

在长达2年的随访的任何阶段,两组间使用Lysholm评分和国际膝关节文献委员会评分评估的临床结果均无差异。两组间胫骨隧道宽度相同。使用生物可吸收干涉螺钉时,股骨隧道增宽略多。

结论

用于自体腘绳肌腱ACL重建的形状相同的生物可吸收干涉螺钉和钛合金干涉螺钉在术后2年内同样成功。

证据水平

I级,随访率超过80%的前瞻性随机试验。

相似文献

1
Bioabsorbable versus titanium interference screws with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up.前交叉韧带重建中使用腘绳肌自体移植物时生物可吸收与钛合金干涉螺钉的比较:一项为期2年随访的前瞻性随机试验。
Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):817-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
2
Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-Year Follow-up.自体腘绳肌腱移植前交叉韧带重建中生物可吸收螺钉与钛螺钉的比较:一项为期5年随访的前瞻性、盲法、随机对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1893-901. doi: 10.1177/0363546515588926. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial of PEEK Versus Titanium Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 2-Year Follow-up.PEEK 与钛干扰螺钉在前交叉韧带重建中的随机对照研究:2 年随访结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2386-2393. doi: 10.1177/0363546519861530. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
4
Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial With 13-Year Follow-up.可吸收螺钉与钛合金螺钉在前交叉韧带重建中应用自体腘绳肌腱移植物的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验,随访 13 年。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1316-1326. doi: 10.1177/0363546520911024. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Comparison of the bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft in MRI and clinical outcome: a prospective randomized study.自体腘绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带后生物可吸收螺钉与金属螺钉固定的MRI及临床疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机研究
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Dec;16(12):1080-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0593-z. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
6
Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography--based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft.前交叉韧带重建术后隧道增宽:一项基于前瞻性随机 CT 比较 2 种不同股骨髓内固定方法的腘绳肌腱移植物的研究。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jun;27(6):776-83. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.009.
7
A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws.可吸收与钛制前交叉韧带挤压螺钉的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Arthroscopy. 2005 Feb;21(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.012.
8
A comparison of the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable versus metal interference screws: a meta-analysis.生物可吸收螺钉与金属干涉螺钉在前交叉韧带重建中结果的比较:荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 16;93(6):572-80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00269.
9
A new bicortical tibial fixation technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadruple hamstring graft.一种用于四股绳肌肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带的新型双皮质胫骨固定技术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(4):218-25. doi: 10.1007/s001670000120.
10
Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.腘绳肌肌腱重建前交叉韧带:可吸收挤压螺钉与纽扣钢板固定的比较
Arthroscopy. 2004 Feb;20(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioabsorbable implants are a viable alternative to traditional metallic implants in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物可吸收植入物在骨科手术中是传统金属植入物的可行替代方案:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2025 Jun 14;65:257-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.005. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Technology Update in Management of Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries.多韧带膝关节损伤管理的技术更新
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Oct 24;58(11):1537-1547. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01281-6. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Radiographic Tibial Tunnel Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts and Biocomposite Screws: A Prospective Study With 10-Year Follow-up.
使用腘绳肌腱自体移植物和生物复合材料螺钉进行前交叉韧带重建术后的胫骨隧道影像学评估:一项为期10年随访的前瞻性研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 17;12(10):23259671241278340. doi: 10.1177/23259671241278340. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation methods and implications on clinical outcomes.前交叉韧带重建固定方法的生物力学比较及其对临床结果的影响
Ann Jt. 2023 Apr 20;8:15. doi: 10.21037/aoj-22-52. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of Bioabsorbable and Metallic Interference Screws for Graft Fixation During ACL Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.前交叉韧带重建术中用于移植物固定的生物可吸收与金属干涉螺钉的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 18;9(8):23259671211021577. doi: 10.1177/23259671211021577. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
A comprehensive scoping review of tibial cysts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后胫骨囊肿的全面范围综述
J Exp Orthop. 2021 Jun 21;8(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00356-9.
7
Computed Tomography Imaging of BioComposite Interference Screw After ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft.采用骨-髌腱-骨移植物进行前交叉韧带重建后生物复合材料干涉螺钉的计算机断层扫描成像
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 May 6;9(5):23259671211006477. doi: 10.1177/23259671211006477. eCollection 2021 May.
8
Clinical translation and challenges of biodegradable magnesium-based interference screws in ACL reconstruction.可生物降解镁基干涉螺钉在 ACL 重建中的临床翻译及挑战
Bioact Mater. 2021 Mar 12;6(10):3231-3243. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.032. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Complications of Bioabsorbable Tibial Interference Screws After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes.儿童和青少年运动员前交叉韧带重建术后生物可吸收胫骨挤压螺钉的并发症
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Feb 26;8(2):2325967120904010. doi: 10.1177/2325967120904010. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Does thread shape affect the fixation strength of the bioabsorbable interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? A biomechanical study.螺纹形状是否会影响用于前交叉韧带重建的生物可吸收干涉螺钉的固定强度?一项生物力学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 8;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2435-1.