Suter Glenn W, Cormier Susan M
National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, MS-A110, 26 W Martin Luther King Jr Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, USA.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2008 Oct;4(4):478-85. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-004.1.
Environmental assessmen practices have not been as successful as they should be. We believe that this is in part because environmental assessors lack a clear and useful set of principles-that is, a theory of practice. We propose a theory that derives 19 principles from 3 axioms: (1) assessments inform environmental management decisions, (2) assessments are science based, and (3) management decisions accommodate multiple goals and constraints. The 1st axiom leads to principles that change the focus from good assessments to good decisions. The 2nd focuses assessments on the scientific needs of the decision maker rather than making policy judgments or consensus building. The 3rd axiom leads to integration across disciplines, scales, and types of evidence. This theory of assessment practice implies the need for a new framework for environmental assessment that is more integrative than existing frameworks and more focused on making decisions that resolve environmental problems. We believe that this theory of environmental assessment can lead to clear assessment practices that compel beneficial and confident environmental management.
环境评估实践并未达到应有的成功程度。我们认为,部分原因在于环境评估人员缺乏一套清晰且有用的原则——即实践理论。我们提出一种理论,该理论从3条公理中推导出19条原则:(1)评估为环境管理决策提供信息,(2)评估以科学为基础,(3)管理决策兼顾多重目标和限制因素。第一条公理引出的原则将重点从良好的评估转向良好的决策。第二条公理将评估聚焦于决策者的科学需求,而非做出政策判断或达成共识。第三条公理促使跨学科、跨尺度以及不同类型证据之间的整合。这种评估实践理论意味着需要一个新的环境评估框架,该框架比现有框架更具综合性,且更侧重于做出解决环境问题的决策。我们相信,这种环境评估理论能够带来清晰的评估实践,促使进行有益且可靠的环境管理。