Taghavi Seyed Alireza, Jafari Ali, Eshraghian Ahad
Gasteroenterology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Mar;54(3):599-603. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0374-z. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
This study compared a new regimen (group A: doxycycline, co-amoxiclav, omeprazole) and two routinely prescribed regimens (group B: amoxicillin, omeprazole, furazolidone, bismuth; group C: amoxicillin, clarithromycin, omeprazole) to find an acceptable first-line treatment option for Helicobacter pylori. The study population consisted of 189 patients who referred to our clinic to undergo endoscopy due to ulcer-like dyspepsia. The H. pylori eradication rate was 68% in group A, 56% in group B, and 70% in group C according to per-control analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in H. pylori eradication between groups A and B (P = 0.187), groups A and C (P = 0.857), and groups B and C (P = 0.15). In conclusion, although none of the three eradication regimens can be recommended as a first-line eradication treatment, the new regimen is at least as effective and probably better tolerated than the two routinely applied regimens.
本研究比较了一种新方案(A组:强力霉素、阿莫西林克拉维酸钾、奥美拉唑)和两种常规处方方案(B组:阿莫西林、奥美拉唑、呋喃唑酮、铋剂;C组:阿莫西林、克拉霉素、奥美拉唑),以寻找一种可接受的幽门螺杆菌一线治疗方案。研究人群包括189例因溃疡样消化不良前来我院接受内镜检查的患者。根据按对照组分析,A组幽门螺杆菌根除率为68%,B组为56%,C组为70%。A组和B组(P = 0.187)、A组和C组(P = 0.857)以及B组和C组(P = 0.15)之间的幽门螺杆菌根除率无统计学显著差异。总之,虽然三种根除方案均不能推荐作为一线根除治疗,但新方案至少与两种常规应用方案效果相同,且耐受性可能更好。