Finkelstein Daniel M, Hill Elaine L, Whitaker Robert C
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc, 955 Massachusetts Ave, Suite 801, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e251-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2814.
The purpose of this study was to describe school food environments and policies in US public schools and how they vary according to school characteristics.
We analyzed cross-sectional data from the third School Nutrition and Dietary Assessment study by using a nationally representative sample of 395 US public schools in 129 school districts in 38 states. These 2005 data included school reports of foods and beverages offered in the National School Lunch Program and on-site observations, in a subsample of schools, of competitive foods and beverages (those sold in vending machines and a la carte and that are not part of the National School Lunch Program). Seventeen factors were used to characterize school lunches, competitive foods, and other food-related policies and practices. These factors were used to compute the food environment summary score (0 [least healthy] to 17 [most healthy]) of each school.
There were vending machines in 17%, 82%, and 97% of elementary, middle, and high schools, respectively, and a la carte items were sold in 71%, 92%, and 93% of schools, respectively. Among secondary schools with vending and a la carte sales, these sources were free of low-nutrient energy-dense foods or beverages in 15% and 21% of middle and high schools, respectively. The food environment summary score was significantly higher (healthier) in the lower grade levels. The summary score was not associated with the percentage of students that was certified for free or reduced-price lunches or the percentage of students that was a racial/ethnic minority.
As children move to higher grade levels, their school food environments become less healthy. The great majority of US secondary schools sell items a la carte in the cafeteria and through vending machines, and these 2 sources often contain low-nutrient, energy-dense foods and beverages, commonly referred to as junk food.
本研究旨在描述美国公立学校的校园饮食环境与政策,以及它们如何因学校特征而有所不同。
我们分析了第三次学校营养与膳食评估研究的横断面数据,该研究采用了来自38个州129个学区的395所美国公立学校的全国代表性样本。这些2005年的数据包括学校关于国家学校午餐计划中提供的食品和饮料的报告,以及在部分学校样本中对竞争性食品和饮料(自动售货机和点菜销售的、不属于国家学校午餐计划的食品和饮料)的现场观察。17个因素用于描述学校午餐、竞争性食品以及其他与食品相关的政策和做法。这些因素用于计算每所学校的饮食环境综合得分(0分[最不健康]至17分[最健康])。
小学、初中和高中分别有17%、82%和97%的学校设有自动售货机,分别有71%、92%和93%的学校出售点菜食品。在有自动售货机和点菜销售的中学中,这些渠道分别在15%的初中和21%的高中没有提供低营养、高能量密度的食品或饮料。低年级的饮食环境综合得分显著更高(更健康)。综合得分与获得免费或减价午餐认证的学生比例或少数族裔学生比例无关。
随着孩子升入更高年级,他们的校园饮食环境变得不那么健康。美国绝大多数中学在自助餐厅和通过自动售货机出售点菜食品,而这两种渠道通常都含有低营养、高能量密度的食品和饮料,通常被称为垃圾食品。