Pisani Paola, Whary Mark T, Nilsson Ingrid, Sriamporn Supannee, Wadström Torkel, Fox James G, Ljungh Asa, Forman David
Descriptive Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert-Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Sep;15(9):1363-8. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00132-08. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
Helicobacter bilis DNA has been detected in human tissue and is a candidate for etiologic investigations on the causes of hepatic and biliary tract diseases, but reliable serologic tests need to be developed in order to pursue such investigations. The scope of this study was to assess the specificity of two assays for H. bilis immune response allowing for H. pylori, and their cross-reactivity in a population in Thailand at high risk for cholangiocarcinoma. Plasma samples from 92 Thai volunteers were independently tested in two laboratories (Massachusetts Institute of Technology [MIT] and Lund). MIT performed three analyses of H. pylori and H. bilis based either on (i) outer membrane protein (OMP) with no preabsorption or on antigens derived from whole-cell sonicate before (ii) or after (iii) preabsorption with H. pylori sonicate protein. Lund used cell surface proteins from H. pylori and H. bilis as antigens. Testing for H. bilis was preabsorbed with a whole-cell lysate of H. pylori. More than 80% of the samples were positive for H. pylori in both laboratories. As tested by MIT, 58.7% (95% confidence interval, 47.9 to 68.9%) were positive for H. bilis by OMP and 44.5% (34.1 to 55.3%) were positive for H. bilis sonicate protein, but only 15.2% (8.6 to 24.2%) remained positive after preabsorption with H. pylori sonicate protein. Lund found 34.5% of the samples positive for H. bilis (22.0 to 41.0%), which was statistically compatible with all three MIT results. Serologic responses to OMPs of the two bacteria coincided in 66 and 45% of the samples in the MIT and Lund assays, respectively. We found high cross-reactivity between the immune responses to H. pylori and H. bilis antigens. More-specific H. bilis antigens need to be isolated to develop serologic tests suitable for epidemiological studies.
在人体组织中已检测到胆汁幽门螺杆菌DNA,它是肝胆道疾病病因学研究的一个候选对象,但为了开展此类研究,需要开发可靠的血清学检测方法。本研究的范围是评估两种针对胆汁幽门螺杆菌免疫反应的检测方法的特异性,同时考虑幽门螺杆菌,以及它们在泰国胆管癌高风险人群中的交叉反应性。来自92名泰国志愿者的血浆样本在两个实验室(麻省理工学院[MIT]和隆德)独立进行检测。麻省理工学院基于以下方法对幽门螺杆菌和胆汁幽门螺杆菌进行了三项分析:(i)未预先吸收的外膜蛋白(OMP),或(ii)用幽门螺杆菌超声破碎蛋白预先吸收之前或(iii)之后的全细胞超声裂解物衍生的抗原。隆德使用幽门螺杆菌和胆汁幽门螺杆菌的细胞表面蛋白作为抗原。对胆汁幽门螺杆菌的检测用幽门螺杆菌的全细胞裂解物进行预先吸收。两个实验室中超过80%的样本幽门螺杆菌检测呈阳性。经麻省理工学院检测,58.7%(95%置信区间,47.9至68.9%)的样本OMP检测胆汁幽门螺杆菌呈阳性,44.5%(34.1至55.3%)的样本超声裂解物蛋白检测胆汁幽门螺杆菌呈阳性,但在用幽门螺杆菌超声破碎蛋白预先吸收后,只有15.2%(8.6至24.2%)仍呈阳性。隆德发现34.5%的样本胆汁幽门螺杆菌检测呈阳性(22.0至41.0%),这在统计学上与麻省理工学院的所有三项结果相符。在麻省理工学院和隆德的检测中,分别有66%和45%的样本对两种细菌的OMP的血清学反应一致。我们发现对幽门螺杆菌和胆汁幽门螺杆菌抗原的免疫反应之间存在高度交叉反应性。需要分离出更具特异性的胆汁幽门螺杆菌抗原,以开发适用于流行病学研究的血清学检测方法。