Manetta Luiz Alberto, de Paula Martins Wellington, Rosa e Silva Júlio César, de Sá Rosa e Silva Ana Carolina Japur, Nogueira Antônio Alberto, Ferriani Rui Alberto
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine-Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Dec;34(12):1914-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.013. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
We compared the effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD) and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) on uterine volume, uterine arteries pulsatility index (PI) and endometrial thickness before and after six months of endometriosis treatment. Sixty women aged 18-40 y were allocated randomly to one of two groups: LNG-IUDs were inserted in 30 women, and GnRHa monthly injections were performed on the other 30. All 60 women were submitted to transvaginal 2-D ultrasound scans on the day that the treatment started and then six months later. Measurements of uterine arteries PI, uterine volume and endometrial thickness were performed at both evaluations. The use of LNG-IUDs significantly decreased endometrial thickness (pre = 6.08 +/- 3.00 mm, post = 2.7 +/- 0.98 mm; mean +/- SD), as did the use of GnRHa (pre = 6.96 +/- 3.82 mm, post = 3.23 +/- 2.32 mm). The uterine volume decreased in the GnRHa group (pre = 86.67 +/- 28.38 cm(3), post = 55.27 +/- 25.52 cm(3)), but not in the LNG-IUD group (pre = 75.77 +/- 20.88 cm(3), post = 75.97 +/- 26.62 cm(3)). Uterine arteries PI increased for both groups; however, the increase was higher in the GnRHa group (0.99 +/- 0.84 vs. 0.38 +/- 0.84, p = 0.007; PI increase in GnRHa and in LNG-IUD groups, respectively). In conclusion, levonorgestrel released directly onto the endometrium by the LNG-IUD induced smaller uterine changes than did the hypoestrogenism induced by GnRHa. Nevertheless, both promoted similar effects on endometrial thickness.
我们比较了左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)在子宫内膜异位症治疗6个月前后对子宫体积、子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)和子宫内膜厚度的影响。将60名年龄在18 - 40岁的女性随机分为两组:30名女性放置LNG-IUD,另外30名每月注射GnRHa。所有60名女性在治疗开始当天及6个月后接受经阴道二维超声扫描。在两次评估中均测量子宫动脉PI、子宫体积和子宫内膜厚度。使用LNG-IUD显著降低了子宫内膜厚度(治疗前 = 6.08±3.00 mm,治疗后 = 2.7±0.98 mm;均值±标准差),使用GnRHa也有同样效果(治疗前 = 6.96±3.82 mm,治疗后 = 3.23±2.32 mm)。GnRHa组子宫体积减小(治疗前 = 86.67±28.38 cm³,治疗后 = 55.27±25.52 cm³),但LNG-IUD组未减小(治疗前 = 75.77±20.88 cm³,治疗后 = 75.97±26.62 cm³)。两组子宫动脉PI均升高;然而,GnRHa组升高幅度更大(分别为0.99±0.84和0.38±0.84,p = 0.007;分别为GnRHa组和LNG-IUD组的PI升高值)。总之,LNG-IUD直接作用于子宫内膜释放的左炔诺孕酮引起的子宫变化比GnRHa诱导的低雌激素状态小。尽管如此,两者对子宫内膜厚度的影响相似。