Glynn T J
Smoking, Tobacco, and Cancer Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Br J Addict. 1991 May;86(5):631-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01821.x.
This essay suggests approaches to two issues of importance to the future of tobacco use control research. First, there is need to identify those areas of tobacco use prevention and cessation research which have evolved to the point where additional investigation would only bring incremental gains. The reduction potential of this research should then be consolidated by applying existing, effective interventions widely and systematically. Conversely, there is need to identify those areas in which additional research is necessary. Second, the most logical way to reach agreement on those areas which are ready to move from research to applications-of-research is, with the co-operation and advice of the research community, through the large funding organizations which have supported this research over the past 2 decades. It is these organizations which, once the most effective intervention are identified, are capable of supporting the centrally-planned, consensus-driven, comprehensive approaches to tobacco use control which will be necessary to continued success in reducing tobacco-related morbidity and mortality in the industralized world and to begin addressing the growing problems of tobacco use in the developing world.
本文提出了对烟草使用控制研究的未来具有重要意义的两个问题的解决方法。首先,有必要确定烟草使用预防和戒烟研究中那些已经发展到进一步研究只会带来渐进收益的领域。然后,应通过广泛而系统地应用现有的有效干预措施来巩固这项研究的减少潜力。相反,有必要确定那些需要进一步研究的领域。其次,就那些准备从研究转向研究应用的领域达成共识的最合理方式是,在研究界的合作与建议下,通过在过去20年里支持这项研究的大型资助组织来实现。一旦确定了最有效的干预措施,正是这些组织有能力支持以中央计划、共识驱动、全面的方式来控制烟草使用,这对于在工业化世界持续成功降低与烟草相关的发病率和死亡率以及开始解决发展中世界日益严重的烟草使用问题是必要的。