Suppr超能文献

在基因病例对照研究中结合同源性身份和关联性

Combining identity by descent and association in genetic case-control studies.

作者信息

Zhang Qingrun, Wang Shuang, Ott Jurg

机构信息

Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 7 Bei Tu Cheng West Road, Beijing 100029, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Genet. 2008 Jul 5;9:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-42.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In human case-control association studies, one of the chi-square tests typically carried out is based on a 2 x 3 table of genotypes (homogeneity of three genotype frequencies in case and control individuals). We formulate the two degrees of freedom associated with a given genotype distribution in terms of two biologically relevant parameters, (1) the probability F that an individual's two alleles are identical by descent (IBD) and (2) the frequency p of one of the alleles.

RESULTS

Imposing the restriction, F > or = 0, makes some of the genotype frequencies invalid thereby reducing noise. We propose a new statistical association test, the FP test, by focusing on allele frequency differences between case and control individuals while allowing for suitable IBD probabilities. Power calculations show that (1) the practice of generally carrying out two association tests (allele and genotype test) has an increased type I error and (2) our test is more powerful than conventional genotype and allele tests under recessive trait inheritance, and at least as powerful as these conventional tests under dominant inheritance.

CONCLUSION

For dominant and recessive modes of inheritance, any apparent power gain by an allele test when carried out in conjunction with a genotype test tends to be purchased entirely by an increased rate of false positive results due to omission of a multiple testing correction. As an alternative to these two standard association tests, our FP test represents a convenient and more powerful alternative.

摘要

背景

在人类病例对照关联研究中,通常进行的卡方检验之一是基于一个2×3的基因型表(病例组和对照组个体中三种基因型频率的齐性)。我们根据两个生物学相关参数来阐述与给定基因型分布相关的两个自由度,(1)个体的两个等位基因通过血缘相同(IBD)的概率F,以及(2)其中一个等位基因的频率p。

结果

施加限制条件F≥0,会使一些基因型频率无效,从而减少噪声。我们提出一种新的统计关联检验,即FP检验,通过关注病例组和对照组个体之间的等位基因频率差异,同时考虑合适的IBD概率。功效计算表明,(1)通常进行两种关联检验(等位基因检验和基因型检验)的做法会增加I型错误率,并且(2)在隐性性状遗传下,我们的检验比传统的基因型和等位基因检验更具功效,在显性遗传下,其功效至少与这些传统检验相同。

结论

对于显性和隐性遗传模式,当与基因型检验一起进行时,等位基因检验所获得的任何明显的功效提升往往完全是以由于遗漏多重检验校正而导致的假阳性结果率增加为代价的。作为这两种标准关联检验的替代方法,我们的FP检验是一种方便且更具功效的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd5/2483716/02127ee217dd/1471-2156-9-42-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验