Ravizza Susan M, Carter Cameron S
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Oct;46(12):2924-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 14.
Task switching is an important aspect of cognitive control and understanding its underlying mechanisms is the focus of considerable research. In this paper, we contrast two different kinds of task switching paradigms and provide evidence that different cognitive mechanisms underlie switching behavior depending on whether the switch is between sets of rules (rule switch) or sets of features presented simultaneously (perceptual switch). In two experiments, we demonstrate that behavioral effects (Experiment 1) and neural recruitment (Experiment 2) vary with the type of switch performed. While perceptual switch costs occurred when the alternative feature set was physically present, rule switch costs were observed even in their absence. Rule switching was also characterized by larger target repetition effects and by greater engagement of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In contrast, perceptual switching was associated with greater recruitment of the parietal cortex. These results provide strong evidence for multiple forms of switching and suggest the limitations of generalizing results across shift types.
任务切换是认知控制的一个重要方面,理解其潜在机制是大量研究的重点。在本文中,我们对比了两种不同的任务切换范式,并提供证据表明,根据切换是在规则集之间(规则切换)还是同时呈现的特征集之间(感知切换),不同的认知机制构成了切换行为的基础。在两个实验中,我们证明行为效应(实验1)和神经活动(实验2)会随着所执行的切换类型而变化。当替代特征集实际存在时会出现感知切换成本,而即使在其不存在时也会观察到规则切换成本。规则切换的特征还包括更大的目标重复效应以及背外侧前额叶皮层的更强参与。相比之下,感知切换与顶叶皮层的更强活动相关。这些结果为多种形式的切换提供了有力证据,并表明跨转换类型进行结果概括的局限性。