Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Sep;57(9):1828-1841. doi: 10.1002/eat.24235. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
Cognitive rigidity, or difficulty adapting to changing demands, is commonly observed in anorexia nervosa. Less is known, however, about cognitive flexibility (CF) in bulimia nervosa (BN) and, particularly, adolescence. Clarifying this relation and best assessment practices may guide informed clinical decision-making. The current study compared how two measures of CF (i.e., Wisconsin Card Sort Task [WCST] and Trail Making Task [TMT]) relate to BN symptoms among adolescents.
Data from a subsample (n = 78) of adolescents with BN were analyzed. Linear and hurdle regressions were used to compare the effects of WCST perseverative errors and TMT performance on Eating Disorder Examination Global Scores, objective binge episodes, and self-induced vomiting episodes (SVEs) at baseline and end-of-treatment (EOT).
Neither CF measure associated with baseline BN symptoms. TMT performance positively associated with the likelihood of engaging in SVEs at EOT (𝛽 = 0.47, p = 0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.11-0.84]) and, among adolescents who endorsed ≥1 SVE at EOT, WCST perseverative errors (𝛽 = 0.05, p = 0.005, 95% CI = [0.01-0.08]) positively associated with SVE frequency at EOT.
The overall lack of associations between CF and outcomes suggests that cognitive rigidity may not be as relevant to the clinical profile of adolescent BN as for anorexia nervosa. In the few significant associations that emerged, the WCST and TMT uniquely predicted the severity of vomiting at EOT in this sample. Given the lack of CF deficits, future work should aim to test the role of other executive functions (e.g., impulsivity), in addition to CF, to determine which deficits are present in adolescent BN and may predict outcomes.
Patients with eating disorders often have difficulties thinking flexibly, which may interfere with their recovery. We tested two ways of measuring flexible thinking in adolescents with BN. Overall, flexible thinking was not associated with symptom-level outcomes. However, less flexible thinking at the start of treatment predicted self-induced vomiting at EOT. If findings are replicable, then assessing and addressing flexible thinking could improve outcomes for adolescents with BN.
认知僵化,即难以适应变化的需求,在神经性厌食症中较为常见。然而,关于神经性贪食症(BN)中的认知灵活性(CF)却知之甚少,尤其是在青少年中。阐明这种关系和最佳评估方法可能有助于做出明智的临床决策。本研究比较了两种 CF 测量方法(即威斯康星卡片分类任务 [WCST]和连线测试任务 [TMT])与青少年 BN 症状的关系。
对 BN 青少年亚样本(n=78)的数据进行了分析。使用线性和障碍回归来比较 WCST 持续错误和 TMT 表现对基线和治疗结束时(EOT)进食障碍检查总评分、客观暴食发作和自我诱导呕吐发作(SVEs)的影响。
两种 CF 测量方法均与基线 BN 症状无关。TMT 表现与 EOT 时发生 SVEs 的可能性呈正相关(β=0.47,p=0.01,95%置信区间 [CI] = [0.11-0.84]),在 EOT 时报告至少 1 次 SVE 的青少年中,WCST 持续错误(β=0.05,p=0.005,95% CI = [0.01-0.08])与 EOT 时 SVE 频率呈正相关。
CF 与结局之间总体缺乏关联表明,认知僵化在青少年 BN 的临床特征中可能不如神经性厌食症那样重要。在出现的少数显著关联中,WCST 和 TMT 独特地预测了该样本 EOT 时呕吐的严重程度。鉴于缺乏 CF 缺陷,未来的工作应该旨在测试其他执行功能(例如,冲动性)的作用,除了 CF 之外,以确定在青少年 BN 中存在哪些缺陷并可能预测结局。
饮食障碍患者通常在灵活思考方面存在困难,这可能会干扰他们的康复。我们测试了两种测量 BN 青少年灵活思维的方法。总体而言,灵活思维与症状水平结局无关。然而,治疗开始时思维灵活性较低预测 EOT 时的自我诱导呕吐。如果研究结果可以复制,那么评估和解决灵活思维可能会改善 BN 青少年的结局。