Lee Jie-Min
Department of Logistic Management, National Kaohsiung Marine University, 142 Hai-Chuan Road, Nan-Tzu, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Public Health. 2008 Oct;122(10):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.12.013. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
This study used cigarette price elasticity estimates to assess the possible effects on cigarette consumption of a large increase in cigarette tax. It also investigated different responses to the cigarette tax increase among smokers from different socio-economic backgrounds and with different smoking characteristics.
Cross-sectional study on 483 valid questionnaires completed during a telephone survey of current smokers aged 15 years and above from all 23 major cities and counties in Taiwan.
This study analysed the willingness of current smokers to quit smoking or reduce cigarette consumption when faced with a tax increase of NT$22 per pack, which would raise the price of cigarettes by 44%. The Tobit regression model and the maximum likelihood method were used to estimate cigarette demand elasticity.
Estimation results yielded a cigarette price elasticity of -0.29 in connection with a 44% increase in the price of cigarettes. This suggests that smokers will have relatively little response to such an event. The most significant response to the price increase was found among women, low-income smokers, moderately addicted smokers, and smokers who regularly purchase low-price cigarettes. A 44% increase in the price of cigarettes would reduce the average annual per capita cigarette consumption in Taiwan by 14.86 packs; a reduction of 12.87%. The tax increase would also boost the Government's cigarette tax revenue by approximately NT$41.4 billion, and increase cigarette merchants' income by approximately NT$27.4 billion.
Since current cigarette prices are low in Taiwan and smokers are relatively insensitive to cigarette price hikes, a large increase in cigarette tax would reduce cigarette consumption effectively, and would also increase the Government's cigarette tax revenue and cigarette merchants' income. Clearly, such a tax would create a win-win outcome for the Government, cigarette merchants and smokers, and it is therefore recommended.
本研究利用香烟价格弹性估计值,评估大幅提高香烟税对香烟消费可能产生的影响。同时,研究不同社会经济背景和不同吸烟特征的吸烟者对香烟税提高的不同反应。
对台湾23个主要市县15岁及以上现吸烟者进行电话调查,完成483份有效问卷的横断面研究。
本研究分析了现吸烟者在面对每包香烟税增加新台币22元(这将使香烟价格提高44%)时戒烟或减少香烟消费的意愿。采用Tobit回归模型和最大似然法估计香烟需求弹性。
估计结果显示,香烟价格提高44%时,香烟价格弹性为-0.29。这表明吸烟者对这种情况的反应相对较小。对价格上涨反应最显著的是女性、低收入吸烟者、中度成瘾吸烟者以及经常购买低价香烟的吸烟者。香烟价格提高44%将使台湾人均年香烟消费量减少14.86包,降幅为12.87%。增税还将使政府的香烟税收增加约新台币414亿元,并使香烟商人的收入增加约新台币274亿元。
由于台湾目前香烟价格较低,吸烟者对香烟价格上涨相对不敏感,大幅提高香烟税将有效减少香烟消费,同时增加政府的香烟税收和香烟商人的收入。显然,这样的税收将为政府、香烟商人和吸烟者创造双赢局面,因此予以推荐。