• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚烟草税收的宏观经济影响。

Macroeconomic impact of tobacco taxation in Indonesia.

机构信息

Center for Indonesia's Strategic Development Initiatives, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Monash Business School Centre for Health Economics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s108-s114. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057735.

DOI:10.1136/tc-2022-057735
PMID:36725330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11187376/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant tobacco tax increase has long been advocated to reduce Indonesia's high smoking prevalence. However, implementing such a policy remains challenging due to the tobacco industry's argument that it would negatively impact the economy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide a comprehensive estimate of the net impact of tobacco taxation on Indonesia's economy.

METHOD

The impact of the tax hike on the economy is simulated through a change in cigarette demand and reallocation of household's budget and allocation government spending from additional tobacco tax revenue. Input-output analysis is employed to estimate the net effect of the tobacco tax rise on the total economic output, income and employment in Indonesia.

FINDING

Increasing the tobacco tax would generate a net positive impact on the economy as it would increase economic output, household income and employment. The positive impact is mainly driven by government spending from additional revenue from increased tobacco taxes. Spending tax revenue using the current structure of government spending has the potential to generate the optimal economic effect. Increasing tobacco tax by 45% from the 2019 tax level would increase economic output, household income and employment by Rp84.2 trillion, Rp24.1 trillion and 400.3 thousand jobs, respectively.

摘要

背景

长期以来,印尼一直主张大幅提高烟草税,以降低该国居高不下的吸烟率。然而,由于烟草业声称这将对经济产生负面影响,因此实施这样的政策仍然具有挑战性。

目的

本研究旨在全面估计烟草税对印度尼西亚经济的净影响。

方法

通过改变香烟需求以及家庭预算的重新分配和政府从额外烟草税收中支出的重新分配来模拟增税对经济的影响。投入产出分析用于估计烟草税上涨对印度尼西亚总经济产出、收入和就业的净影响。

发现

提高烟草税将对经济产生净积极影响,因为它将增加经济产出、家庭收入和就业。积极影响主要是由政府从增加的烟草税收入中支出推动的。按照现行政府支出结构使用税收收入有潜力产生最佳的经济效果。将烟草税从 2019 年的税率提高 45%,将分别使经济产出、家庭收入和就业增加 84.2 万亿卢比、24.1 万亿卢比和 40.03 万个工作岗位。

相似文献

1
Macroeconomic impact of tobacco taxation in Indonesia.印度尼西亚烟草税收的宏观经济影响。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s108-s114. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057735.
2
Effects of cigarette tax on cigarette consumption and the Chinese economy.香烟税对香烟消费及中国经济的影响。
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):105-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.105.
3
Exploiting a low tax system: non-tax-induced cigarette price increases in Taiwan 2011-2016.利用低税制:2011-2016 年台湾非税收因素导致的香烟价格上涨。
Tob Control. 2019 Dec;28(e2):e126-e132. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054908. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
4
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Firm strategy and consumer behaviour under a complex tobacco tax system: implications for the effectiveness of taxation on tobacco control.复杂烟草税体系下的企业战略与消费者行为:对烟草税收控烟有效性的影响
Tob Control. 2017 May;26(3):277-283. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052808. Epub 2016 May 20.
6
Tobacco industry in Mexico: a general equilibrium analysis.墨西哥的烟草业:一般均衡分析。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s118-s123. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056864. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
7
On the impacts of higher tobacco taxes in Argentina: a computable general equilibrium approach.关于提高阿根廷烟草税的影响:一种可计算一般均衡方法。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s115-s121. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057725.
8
Crowding out and impoverishing effect of tobacco in Mexico.墨西哥烟草的排挤效应和贫困效应。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s68-s74. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057791.
9
Cigarette tax avoidance and evasion: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project.香烟避税与逃税:国际烟草控制政策评估(ITC)项目的研究结果
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i13-22. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051074. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
The rewards, risks and challenges of regional tobacco tax harmonisation.区域烟草税协调的收益、风险和挑战。
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e7-11. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051241. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
From capacity building to collaboration in tobacco economics research.从烟草经济学研究的能力建设到合作
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s34-s37. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057821.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2019 economic cost of smoking-attributable diseases in Indonesia.2019 年印度尼西亚因吸烟导致疾病的经济成本。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s133-s139. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056890. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Cigarette prices in a complex cigarette tax system: empirical evidence from Indonesia.复杂卷烟税收体系下的卷烟价格:来自印度尼西亚的实证证据
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(6):618-623. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054872. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
The effects of a rise in cigarette price on cigarette consumption, tobacco taxation revenues, and of smoking-related deaths in 28 EU countries-- applying threshold regression modelling.
采用阈值回归模型研究香烟价格上涨对28个欧盟国家香烟消费、烟草税收收入及吸烟相关死亡的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 21;17(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4685-x.
4
Effect of cigarette tax increase in combination with mass media campaign on smoking behaviour in Mauritius: findings from the ITC Mauritius Survey.提高香烟税并结合大众媒体宣传运动对毛里求斯吸烟行为的影响:国际烟草控制(ITC)毛里求斯调查结果
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3(0 3):iii71-iii75. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052096. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
5
Use of interrupted time-series method to evaluate the impact of cigarette excise tax increases in Pennsylvania, 2000-2009.运用中断时间序列法评估 2000-2009 年宾夕法尼亚州香烟消费税提高的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 3;10:E169. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120268.
6
The effect of taxation on tobacco consumption and public revenues in Lebanon.黎巴嫩税收对烟草消费和公共收入的影响。
Tob Control. 2015 Jan;24(1):77-81. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050703. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
The recent and projected public health and economic benefits of cigarette taxation in Greece.希腊香烟税近期及预计的公共卫生和经济效益。
Tob Control. 2014 Sep;23(5):452-4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Economic and public health impact of 2007-2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine.2007-2010 年乌克兰提高烟草税的经济和公共卫生影响。
Tob Control. 2012 Jul;21(4):429-35. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.040071. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
9
The case for OFSMOKE: how tobacco price regulation is needed to promote the health of markets, government revenue and the public.支持 OFSMOKE:为何需要对烟草价格进行监管以促进市场、政府收入和公众健康。
Tob Control. 2010 Oct;19(5):423-30. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.034470.
10
Cigarette smoking in Indonesia: examination of a myopic model of addictive behaviour.印度尼西亚的吸烟现象:对成瘾行为近视模型的考察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Jun;7(6):2473-85. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7062473. Epub 2010 Jun 4.