Suppr超能文献

用于食品和食品补充剂的植物药及植物制剂的风险评估:新出现的问题。

Risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use in food and food supplements: emerging issues.

作者信息

Rietjens Ivonne M C M, Slob Wout, Galli Corrado, Silano Vittorio

机构信息

Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, Tuinlaan 5, 6703HE Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 2008 Aug 15;180(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.024. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

Abstract

At present there is a growing interest for use of botanicals and botanical ingredients in medicines, for teas or in foods and in food supplements. In addition, a number of plant-derived food items form an integral part of regular human diets. Currently, there is an increasing awareness among safety experts and regulators of risks associated with the use of botanicals and botanical ingredients in food including food supplements. It is becoming clear that "natural" does not equal "safe" and that, in modern society, adverse health effects can occur as a result of (mis)use. With the growing awareness of these issues efforts to ensure safety of botanicals and botanical ingredients are also increasing. Several guidance documents on safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations to be used as ingredients in food and food supplements have been published, although, at present, relevant legislative frameworks and guidances for risk assessment are not established yet. Furthermore, when defining possible guidance documents for risk assessment of botanicals, several issues emerge that need to be developed beyond the present state-of-the-art. The present paper describes some of the issues to be considered and developed to a further extent to improve risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations, illustrated by examples based on some allylalkoxybenzenes. It is concluded that, for an improved and more accurate future risk assessment of botanicals, it is necessary to further develop and validate: (i) the use of the margin of exposure (MOE) concept for compounds that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic; (ii) new ways to quantify and incorporate matrix effects into risk assessment strategies; (iii) the use of analytical chemistry approaches, enabling complete chemical characterisation of complex mixtures. Defining new approaches in risk assessment would be in line with the inspiring attitude of the late Professor Robert Kroes, who, for example by supporting the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept, was a pioneer for development and implementation of new paradigms in the field of risk assessment and food safety.

摘要

目前,人们越来越有兴趣将植物药和植物成分用于药品、茶、食品及食品补充剂中。此外,一些植物源性食品是人类日常饮食中不可或缺的一部分。当前,安全专家和监管机构越来越意识到在食品(包括食品补充剂)中使用植物药和植物成分所带来的风险。越来越明显的是,“天然”并不等同于“安全”,在现代社会中,(不当)使用植物药和植物成分可能会对健康产生不良影响。随着对这些问题的认识不断提高,确保植物药和植物成分安全性的努力也在增加。尽管目前尚未建立相关的立法框架和风险评估指南,但已经发布了一些关于用作食品和食品补充剂成分的植物药和植物制剂安全性评估的指导文件。此外,在制定植物药风险评估的可能指导文件时,出现了一些需要在现有技术水平基础上进一步发展的问题。本文描述了一些需要进一步考虑和发展的问题,以改进植物药和植物制剂的风险评估,并以一些烯丙基烷氧基苯为例进行说明。得出的结论是,为了在未来对植物药进行更完善、更准确的风险评估,有必要进一步开发和验证:(i)对于具有遗传毒性和致癌性的化合物,使用暴露边际(MOE)概念;(ii)将基质效应量化并纳入风险评估策略的新方法;(iii)使用分析化学方法,实现对复杂混合物的完整化学表征。定义风险评估的新方法将与已故的罗伯特·克罗斯教授的鼓舞人心的态度相一致,例如,他通过支持毒理学关注阈值(TTC)概念,成为风险评估和食品安全领域新范式发展与实施的先驱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验