• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用成分水平表征对植物性膳食补充剂成分安全性进行计算机模拟研究的方法。

In silico approach to safety of botanical dietary supplement ingredients utilizing constituent-level characterization.

作者信息

Little Jason G, Marsman Daniel S, Baker Timothy R, Mahony Catherine

机构信息

The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, OH 45040, United States.

The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, OH 45040, United States.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Sep;107(Pt A):418-429. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.017
PMID:28698155
Abstract

Botanicals used in dietary supplements industry can have toxicology concerns related to endpoint gaps that cannot be fully resolved by a history of use, or existence of conflicting safety data. However, traditional toxicological studies on botanicals are scientifically and pragmatically challenging due to testing of complex mixtures of constituents, cost, time, and animal usage. Alternatively, we developed an in silico decision-tree approach to address data gaps and inform need for further studies by toxicologically evaluating the chemical composition of botanicals. Following advanced multi-detector analytical characterization of a botanical, each chemical constituent is: (a.) quantitatively benchmarked against similar constituents in commonly consumed foods or botanicals with well-established safety profiles, (b.) systematically evaluated for toxicity data utilizing structure-activity relationships, and, (c.) compared to established thresholds of toxicological concern in absence of safety data or structural analogs. Finally, where safety endpoint gaps are identified which cannot be resolved without additional in vitro or in vivo studies, the botanical compositional data are critical to inform on study design. Results with three herbal preparations demonstrate the utility of this novel approach to identify potential hazards and establish safe human use levels for botanicals in a cost efficient and informative manner that minimizes animal use.

摘要

膳食补充剂行业中使用的植物药可能存在毒理学问题,这些问题与使用历史或相互矛盾的安全数据无法完全解决的终点差距有关。然而,由于植物药成分复杂混合物的测试、成本、时间和动物使用等因素,传统的植物药毒理学研究在科学和实际操作上都具有挑战性。作为替代方法,我们开发了一种计算机决策树方法,通过对植物药的化学成分进行毒理学评估来解决数据差距并为进一步研究提供依据。在对一种植物药进行先进的多检测器分析表征之后,每种化学成分都要:(a.) 与常见食用食品或具有公认安全概况的植物药中的类似成分进行定量基准比较;(b.) 利用构效关系系统地评估毒性数据;以及 (c.) 在没有安全数据或结构类似物的情况下,与既定的毒理学关注阈值进行比较。最后,在确定了没有额外的体外或体内研究就无法解决的安全终点差距的情况下,植物药成分数据对于研究设计至关重要。三种草药制剂的结果证明了这种新方法的实用性,即以经济高效且信息丰富的方式识别潜在危害并确定植物药的安全人体使用水平,同时尽量减少动物使用。

相似文献

1
In silico approach to safety of botanical dietary supplement ingredients utilizing constituent-level characterization.利用成分水平表征对植物性膳食补充剂成分安全性进行计算机模拟研究的方法。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Sep;107(Pt A):418-429. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
2
A Tiered Approach for the Evaluation of the Safety of Botanicals Used as Dietary Supplements: An Industry Strategy.用于膳食补充剂的植物药安全性评估的分层方法:产业策略。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;104(3):446-457. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1132. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
3
Development of a consensus approach for botanical safety evaluation - A roundtable report.制定植物安全性评估共识方法——圆桌会议报告。
Toxicol Lett. 2019 Oct 10;314:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 10.
4
A multi-detector chromatographic approach for characterization and quantitation of botanical constituents to enable in silico safety assessments.一种用于鉴定和定量植物成分的多检测器色谱方法,以实现计算机辅助安全评估。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 Aug;410(21):5143-5154. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1163-y. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
Finding the bad actor: Challenges in identifying toxic constituents in botanical dietary supplements.发现不良行为者:鉴定植物性膳食补充剂中有毒成分的挑战。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Feb;124:431-438. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use in food and food supplements: emerging issues.用于食品和食品补充剂的植物药及植物制剂的风险评估:新出现的问题。
Toxicol Lett. 2008 Aug 15;180(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.024. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
7
Development of Safe and Effective Botanical Dietary Supplements.安全有效的植物性膳食补充剂的开发。
J Med Chem. 2015 Nov 12;58(21):8360-72. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00417. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
8
Safety issues of botanicals and botanical preparations in functional foods.功能性食品中植物药及植物制剂的安全性问题。
Toxicology. 2004 May 20;198(1-3):213-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.01.028.
9
Updates on chemical and biological research on botanical ingredients in dietary supplements.膳食补充剂中植物成分的化学和生物研究进展。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 May;405(13):4373-84. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-6691-2. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
10
Safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations used as ingredients in food supplements: testing an European Food Safety Authority-tiered approach.作为食品补充剂成分的植物药和植物制剂的安全性评估:测试欧洲食品安全局分层方法。
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010 Feb;54(2):175-85. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900240.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-detector analytical approach for characterizing complex botanical extracts: a case study on ashwagandha.一种用于表征复杂植物提取物的多检测器分析方法:以印度人参为例的案例研究。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00216-025-06006-8.
2
Technology Readiness Level Roadmap for Developing Innovative Herbal Medicinal Products.开发创新草药产品的技术就绪水平路线图。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 May 29;17(6):703. doi: 10.3390/ph17060703.
3
Hepatotoxicity due to herbal dietary supplements: Past, present and the future.草药膳食补充剂导致的肝毒性:过去、现在和未来。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Nov;169:113445. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113445. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Chemometric-Guided Approaches for Profiling and Authenticating Botanical Materials.化学计量学引导的植物材料分析与鉴定方法
Front Nutr. 2021 Nov 26;8:780228. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.780228. eCollection 2021.
5
Zebrafish as a Successful Animal Model for Screening Toxicity of Medicinal Plants.斑马鱼作为筛选药用植物毒性的成功动物模型。
Plants (Basel). 2020 Oct 12;9(10):1345. doi: 10.3390/plants9101345.
6
Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.读片(read-across)的国际化作为一种经过验证的新方法(NAM)用于监管毒理学。
ALTEX. 2020;37(4):579-606. doi: 10.14573/altex.1912181. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Evaluation of Botanical and Dietary Supplements.使用Tox21高通量筛选分析法评估植物性和膳食补充剂
Appl In Vitro Toxicol. 2019 Mar 1;5(1):10-25. doi: 10.1089/aivt.2018.0020. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
8
Multi-Detector Characterization of Grape Seed Extract to Enable Safety Assessment.葡萄籽提取物的多探测器表征以实现安全性评估。
Front Chem. 2018 Aug 14;6:334. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00334. eCollection 2018.
9
A multi-detector chromatographic approach for characterization and quantitation of botanical constituents to enable in silico safety assessments.一种用于鉴定和定量植物成分的多检测器色谱方法,以实现计算机辅助安全评估。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 Aug;410(21):5143-5154. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1163-y. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
10
A Tiered Approach for the Evaluation of the Safety of Botanicals Used as Dietary Supplements: An Industry Strategy.用于膳食补充剂的植物药安全性评估的分层方法:产业策略。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;104(3):446-457. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1132. Epub 2018 Aug 8.