Naganawa Shinji, Satake Hiroko, Iwano Shingo, Fukatsu Hiroshi, Sone Michihiko, Nakashima Tsutomu
Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(2):85-91. doi: 10.2463/mrms.7.85.
Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops by 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-FLAIR using conventional turbo-spin-echo (3D-FLAIR-CONV) after intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA has been reported in patients with Ménière's disease. Compared to 3D-FLAIR-CONV used in previous studies, the addition of a variable flip-angle technique (3D-FLAIR-VFL) enables very long echo trains and, therefore, shorter scan times. We evaluated whether 3D-FLAIR-VFL could replace 3D-FLAIR-CONV in detecting endolymphatic hydrops after intratympanic Gd-DTPA administration.
Eleven patients were included in this study. Twenty-four hours after Gd-DTPA injection, we performed 3D-FLAIR-CONV and 3D-FLAIR-VFL imaging at 3T. We compared the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between cochlear fluid and the cerebellum between the 2 FLAIR sequences. We subjectively scored the size of the endolymphatic space in the cochlea and vestibule for each patient and correlated the scores with the clinical diagnoses.
The CNR of 3D-FLAIR-CONV was significantly higher than that of 3D-FLAIR-VFL. Scores for the size of endolymphatic space in the vestibule were identical between the 2 sequences; however, those in the cochlea disagreed in 3 cases. 3D-FLAIR-CONV correlated better with the clinical diagnoses.
Currently, we may not be able to replace 3D-FLAIR-CONV with 3D-FLAIR-VFL, at least not with the scanning parameters used in the present study.
据报道,在梅尼埃病患者中,经鼓膜内注射钆喷酸葡胺(Gd-DTPA)后,采用传统涡轮自旋回波的三维液体衰减反转恢复序列(3D-FLAIR-CONV)可实现内淋巴积水的可视化。与先前研究中使用的3D-FLAIR-CONV相比,可变翻转角技术(3D-FLAIR-VFL)的加入可实现非常长的回波链,从而缩短扫描时间。我们评估了在鼓膜内注射Gd-DTPA后,3D-FLAIR-VFL是否能够替代3D-FLAIR-CONV用于检测内淋巴积水。
本研究纳入了11例患者。在注射Gd-DTPA 24小时后,我们在3T条件下进行了3D-FLAIR-CONV和3D-FLAIR-VFL成像。我们比较了两种FLAIR序列中蜗管内液体与小脑之间的对比噪声比(CNR)。我们对每位患者耳蜗和前庭内淋巴间隙的大小进行主观评分,并将评分与临床诊断结果进行关联。
3D-FLAIR-CONV的CNR显著高于3D-FLAIR-VFL。两种序列在前庭内淋巴间隙大小的评分上一致;然而,在耳蜗内淋巴间隙大小的评分上,有3例不一致。3D-FLAIR-CONV与临床诊断的相关性更好。
目前,我们可能无法用3D-FLAIR-VFL替代3D-FLAIR-CONV,至少不能用本研究中使用的扫描参数来替代。