Stone Michael B, Wang Ralph, Price Daniel D
Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate/Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;26(6):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.09.011.
Emergency physicians often treat patients who require procedural sedation for the management of upper extremity fractures, dislocations, and abscesses (upper extremity emergencies). Unfortunately, procedural sedation is associated with several rare but potentially serious adverse effects and requires continuous hemodynamic monitoring and several dedicated staff members. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus nerve blocks in the emergency department (ED) as an alternative to procedural sedation for the management of upper extremity emergencies.
In a prospective trial, a convenience sample of ED patients with upper extremity emergencies that would normally require procedural sedation were assigned to receive either procedural sedation or an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block. Emergency department length of stay (ED LOS) was the primary outcome measure and was analyzed using a paired 2-tailed Student t test.
A total of 12 subjects were enrolled. Average ED LOS for subjects receiving the brachial plexus nerve block was 106 minutes (95% confidence interval, 57-155 minutes). Average ED LOS for subjects receiving procedural sedation was 285 minutes (95% confidence interval, 228-343 minutes). The ED LOS was significantly shorter in the nerve block group (P < .0005). Patient satisfaction was high in both groups, and no significant complications occurred in either group.
In our population, ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve blocks resulted in shorter ED LOS compared to procedural sedation for patients with upper extremity fractures, dislocations, or abscesses.
急诊医生经常治疗那些因上肢骨折、脱位和脓肿(上肢急症)的处理而需要进行程序性镇静的患者。不幸的是,程序性镇静会带来一些罕见但可能严重的不良反应,并且需要持续的血流动力学监测以及多名专业工作人员。本研究的目的是确定超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞在急诊科(ED)作为上肢急症处理中程序性镇静替代方法的作用。
在一项前瞻性试验中,将通常需要程序性镇静的上肢急症ED患者的便利样本,分配接受程序性镇静或超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞。急诊科住院时间(ED LOS)是主要结局指标,并使用配对双尾学生t检验进行分析。
共纳入12名受试者。接受臂丛神经阻滞的受试者的平均ED LOS为106分钟(95%置信区间,57 - 155分钟)。接受程序性镇静的受试者的平均ED LOS为285分钟(95%置信区间,228 - 343分钟)。神经阻滞组的ED LOS显著更短(P <.0005)。两组患者满意度均较高,且两组均未发生显著并发症。
在我们的研究人群中,对于上肢骨折、脱位或脓肿患者,与程序性镇静相比,超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞导致ED LOS更短。