• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞可避免膈神经麻痹。

Hemidiaphragmatic paresis can be avoided in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):595-9. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbd83.

DOI:10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbd83
PMID:19916254
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is associated with 50% to 67% incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis as a result of phrenic nerve block. We examined whether ultrasound-guided compared with nerve stimulation supraclavicular brachial plexus block using 0.75% ropivacaine results in a lower incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized observer-blinded controlled trial, 60 patients scheduled for elective elbow, forearm, wrist, or hand surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block without sedation were included. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine using either ultrasound or nerve stimulation guidance. Ventilatory function was assessed by ultrasound examination of hemidiaphragmatic movement and spirometry.

RESULTS

None of the 30 patients in the ultrasound group showed complete or partial paresis of the hemidiaphragm (95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.14), whereas in the nerve stimulation group, 15 patients showed complete paresis of the hemidiaphragm and 1 patient showed partial paresis of the hemidiaphragm (0% versus 53%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Ventilatory function (forced expiratory volume 1, forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow) was significantly reduced in the nerve stimulation group compared with the ultrasound-guided group (P < 0.05). Two block failures occurred in the nerve stimulation group compared with none in the ultrasound group (P = 0.49). No adverse effects occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block, using 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine with the described technique, is not associated with hemidiaphragmatic paresis.

摘要

背景与目的

锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞会导致膈神经阻滞,膈神经阻滞的发生率为 50%至 67%,进而导致膈肌部分或完全麻痹。我们研究了在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中,与神经刺激引导相比,超声引导使用 0.75%罗哌卡因是否会降低膈神经阻滞的发生率。

方法

在一项前瞻性、随机、观察者设盲、对照临床试验中,纳入了 60 例拟在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞下接受择期肘部、前臂、腕部或手部手术且未镇静的患者。使用 0.75%罗哌卡因 20mL 行锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞,采用超声或神经刺激引导。通过超声检查膈肌运动和肺量测定评估呼吸功能。

结果

在超声组的 30 例患者中,均未出现完全或部分膈肌麻痹(95%置信区间,0.00 至 0.14),而在神经刺激组,15 例患者出现完全膈肌麻痹,1 例患者出现部分膈肌麻痹(分别为 0%和 53%;P<0.0001)。与超声引导组相比,神经刺激组的呼吸功能(1 秒用力呼气量、用力肺活量、呼气峰流速)显著降低(P<0.05)。与超声组相比,神经刺激组有 2 例阻滞失败,而超声组无阻滞失败(P=0.49)。两组均未发生不良反应。

结论

在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中,使用 20mL0.75%罗哌卡因,并采用描述的技术进行超声引导,不会导致膈肌麻痹。

相似文献

1
Hemidiaphragmatic paresis can be avoided in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞可避免膈神经麻痹。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):595-9. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbd83.
2
Ultrasound-guided low-dose interscalene brachial plexus block reduces the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis.超声引导下低剂量锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞可降低膈肌麻痹的发生率。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):498-502. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b49256.
3
Reduced hemidiaphragmatic paresis with extrafascial compared with conventional intrafascial tip placement for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.连续锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞时,筋膜外相较于筋膜内尖端置管可减少膈神经麻痹:一项随机、对照、双盲试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):586-592. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex050.
4
Decreasing the local anesthetic volume from 20 to 10 mL for ultrasound-guided interscalene block at the cricoid level does not reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis.将超声引导下环甲水平肌间沟阻滞的局部麻醉药容量从 20 毫升减少至 10 毫升并不会降低膈肌麻痹的发生率。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):17-20. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3182030648.
5
Reduced Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis With a "Corner Pocket" Technique for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Single-Center, Observer-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中“角落口袋”技术减少膈神经麻痹:单中心、观察者盲法、随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):720-724. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000795.
6
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular vs infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in children.超声引导下儿童锁骨上与锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):838-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02644.x. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
7
Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis after a supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus block: A randomised observer blinded study.锁骨上和锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞致同侧膈肌麻痹:一项随机观察者盲法研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;36(10):787-795. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001069.
8
Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: a randomized clinical trial.超声引导锁骨上与锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞后面横膈神经麻痹:一项随机临床试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):133-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000215.
9
Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis Following Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block With 2-Point Injection Technique.肌间沟两点法臂丛神经阻滞致膈神经麻痹。
Pain Physician. 2021 Dec;24(8):507-515.
10
Vertical infraclavicular block of the brachial plexus: effects on hemidiaphragmatic movement and ventilatory function.臂丛神经锁骨下垂直阻滞:对半侧膈肌运动及通气功能的影响
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;30(6):529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.08.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Intertruncal versus classical approach to supraclavicular brachial plexus block on sensory-motor blockade for upper extremity surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.躯干间入路与经典入路行锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术感觉运动阻滞的比较:一项随机对照非劣效性试验
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2025 Aug;78(4):321-330. doi: 10.4097/kja.24526. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Assessment of the Incidence of Hemi-Diaphragmatic Paralysis Following Infraclavicular and Supraclavicular Approaches for Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Study.锁骨下和锁骨上入路臂丛神经阻滞后半膈肌麻痹发生率的评估:一项随机对照研究。
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2025 Feb 11;53(1):20-27. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2025.241648.
3
Respiratory impact of local anaesthetic volume after interscalene brachial plexus block with extrafascial injection: a randomised controlled double-blinded trial.
肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞筋膜外注射后局部麻醉药容量对呼吸的影响:一项随机对照双盲试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;134(4):1153-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.010. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
4
Perioperative Diaphragm Dysfunction.围手术期膈肌功能障碍
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 17;13(2):519. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020519.
5
Supraclavicular brachial plexus block: the unsung hero of emergency department regional anesthesia.锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞:急诊科区域麻醉的无名英雄。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;10(3):342-344. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.035. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
6
An alternative approach for blocking the superior trunk of the brachial plexus evaluated by a single arm clinical trial.一项单臂临床试验评估的臂丛上干阻滞的替代方法。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov-Dec;72(6):774-779. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.10.015. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following costoclavicular versus supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial.锁骨下与锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞后面横膈膜麻痹:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97843-x.
8
Dose-response relationship between local anesthetic volume and hemidiaphragmatic paresis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade.超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞时局部麻醉药容量与膈肌麻痹的量效关系。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;45(12):979-984. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101728. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular vs. retroclavicular block of the brachial plexus: comparison of ipsilateral diaphragmatic function: A randomised clinical trial.超声引导锁骨上与锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞:同侧膈肌功能比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Jan;38(1):64-72. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001305.
10
Costoclavicular brachial plexus block reduces hemidiaphragmatic paralysis more than supraclavicular brachial plexus block: retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study.锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞比锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞更能减少半膈肌麻痹:一项回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Korean J Pain. 2020 Apr 1;33(2):144-152. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.144.