• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症患者心理词典中的句法-语义关系。

Syntactic-semantic relationships in the mental lexicon of aphasic patients.

作者信息

Erdeljac Vlasta, Sekulić Martina

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Clin Linguist Phon. 2008 Oct-Nov;22(10-11):795-803. doi: 10.1080/02699200802130656.

DOI:10.1080/02699200802130656
PMID:18608237
Abstract

This paper examines the relative values of syntactic-semantic relationships in the mental lexicon of aphasic patients, which were tested within syntagmatic and paradigmatic networks of lexical relations. Semantic relations, such as synonymy, antonomy, and hyperonymy, as well as collocational and coordinational syntactic-semantic relations, were examined simultaneously. Twenty-five subjects diagnosed with nominal aphasia were tested, as well as a control group of 20 healthy subjects. The control group was matched with the aphasic group in terms of dominant hemisphere, age, sex, and job. A naming test based on semantic context was used in this research. The test was presented orally to subjects. After the examiner had read a sentence, subjects were supposed to finish it with a target word (the word which was, through context, in a syntactic-semantic relationship with the rest of the sentence). Sentences were composed of highly frequently occurring words. The categories used in the test were randomly patterned. The resultant data were analysed according to adequate semantic relations of the answers in the given context, and according to the type of the semantic-syntactic relation in 'wrong' answers. Results of this analysis are interpreted according to current psycholinguistic theories.

摘要

本文研究了失语症患者心理词库中句法-语义关系的相对价值,这些关系在词汇关系的组合和聚合网络中进行了测试。同时考察了语义关系,如同义关系、反义关系和上位关系,以及搭配和并列的句法-语义关系。对25名被诊断为名词性失语症的受试者以及20名健康受试者组成的对照组进行了测试。对照组在优势半球、年龄、性别和工作方面与失语症组相匹配。本研究使用了基于语义语境的命名测试。测试以口头方式呈现给受试者。在考官读完一个句子后,受试者要用一个目标词来完成句子(这个词通过语境与句子的其余部分存在句法-语义关系)。句子由高频出现的词组成。测试中使用的类别是随机排列的。根据给定语境中答案的适当语义关系以及“错误”答案中的语义-句法关系类型对所得数据进行分析。根据当前的心理语言学理论对该分析结果进行解释。

相似文献

1
Syntactic-semantic relationships in the mental lexicon of aphasic patients.失语症患者心理词典中的句法-语义关系。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2008 Oct-Nov;22(10-11):795-803. doi: 10.1080/02699200802130656.
2
[Variability in the semantic errors produced by brain-injured patients].[脑损伤患者产生的语义错误的变异性]
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):795-800.
3
Spared access to idiomatic and literal meanings: a single-case approach.保留对习语意义和字面意义的理解:一种单病例研究方法。
Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):207-15. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00384-5.
4
Syntactic and semantic contributions to sentence comprehension in agrammatism.句法和语义对语法缺失症患者句子理解的影响
Brain Lang. 1989 Oct;37(3):419-39. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90029-1.
5
[Variability of right hemisphere activation during semantic word processing in aphasic patients: an electrophysiologic study in three patients].[失语症患者语义词加工过程中右半球激活的变异性:对三名患者的电生理研究]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2002 Mar;158(3):317-31.
6
A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects.失语症句法加工研究I:行为(心理语言学)方面
Brain Lang. 2007 May;101(2):103-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.225. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
7
Impairment of sentence comprehension.句子理解受损。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Oct 29;346(1315):47-53. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0127.
8
Linguistic deficits in the acute phase of stroke.中风急性期的语言缺陷。
J Neurol. 2003 Aug;250(8):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-1134-9.
9
Functional reorganization of language networks for semantics and syntax in chronic stroke: Evidence from MEG.慢性卒中患者语言网络语义和句法功能重组:来自脑磁图的证据
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Aug;37(8):2869-93. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23212. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
Grammaticality judgment in aphasia: deficits are not specific to syntactic structures, aphasic syndromes, or lesion sites.失语症中的语法判断:缺陷并非特定于句法结构、失语症综合征或病变部位。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):238-52. doi: 10.1162/089892904322984535.