Saffran E M, Schwartz M F
Department of Neurology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Oct 29;346(1315):47-53. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0127.
We examine two different forms of comprehension impairment, 'semantic dementia' and 'asyntactic comprehension', focusing on the assignment of thematic roles; the determination of who did it to whom. We show, first, that the loss of word meaning does not impede thematic assignment in semantic dementia, demonstrating that syntactic information, along with some knowledge of the verb, is sufficient for the assignment of thematic roles. Studies of normal subjects indicate, however, that this process is normally subject to semantic influences; asked to judge the plausibility of sentences, subjects respond faster when thematic assignment is semantically constrained. The sentence plausibility judgments of 'asyntactic' comprehenders (aphasics with diminished syntactic control over thematic assignment) show increased effects of these semantic constraints. We discuss these results in relation to current issues in sentence processing.
我们研究了两种不同形式的理解障碍,即“语义性痴呆”和“句法理解障碍”,重点关注题元角色的分配;即确定谁对谁做了什么。首先,我们表明,在语义性痴呆中,词义的丧失并不妨碍题元角色的分配,这表明句法信息以及对动词的一些了解足以进行题元角色的分配。然而,对正常受试者的研究表明,这一过程通常会受到语义影响;当被要求判断句子的合理性时,受试者在题元角色分配受到语义限制时反应更快。“句法理解障碍”患者(对题元角色分配的句法控制减弱的失语症患者)的句子合理性判断显示出这些语义限制的影响增强。我们结合句子处理中的当前问题讨论了这些结果。