Suppr超能文献

[脑损伤患者产生的语义错误的变异性]

[Variability in the semantic errors produced by brain-injured patients].

作者信息

González Nosti María, Rodríguez Ferreiro Javier, Cuetos Vega Fernando

机构信息

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):795-800.

Abstract

One of the most common types of errors produced by aphasic patients during oral word production is semantic errors. However, although aphasia semantic errors are often treated as a single homogenous group, there are, in fact, several subtypes defined by the nature of the error-target relationship: paradigmatic, if the two words are category coordinates; syntagmatic, if they are associatively related but from different semantic categories; and superordinate, if the meaning of the error is broader than the meaning of the target. The goal of this study was to investigate whether or not these various subtypes of semantic errors have a similar processing origin. With this objective, we compared the patterns of semantic errors made by a group of Alzheimer patients in a picture-naming task with those made by a group of aphasic patients. We examined the percentages of the different error types, the degree of association between target and error, and the frequency values both of errors and targets. The results suggest that the three subtypes of semantic errors have different origins: the superordinate appear to arise at the semantic level, the syntagmatic at the lexical level, and the paradigmatic at both levels of processing.

摘要

失语症患者在口语单词生成过程中产生的最常见错误类型之一是语义错误。然而,尽管失语症语义错误通常被视为一个单一的同质群体,但实际上,根据错误与目标的关系性质可以定义几种亚型:如果两个词是类别坐标,则为范例性错误;如果它们是联想相关但来自不同语义类别,则为组合性错误;如果错误的含义比目标的含义更宽泛,则为上位性错误。本研究的目的是调查这些不同亚型的语义错误是否具有相似的加工起源。出于这个目的,我们将一组阿尔茨海默病患者在图片命名任务中产生的语义错误模式与一组失语症患者产生的模式进行了比较。我们检查了不同错误类型的百分比、目标与错误之间的关联程度以及错误和目标的频率值。结果表明,语义错误的三种亚型有不同的起源:上位性错误似乎出现在语义层面,组合性错误出现在词汇层面,范例性错误则出现在两个加工层面。

相似文献

3
Category and letter fluency in semantic dementia, primary progressive aphasia, and Alzheimer's disease.
Brain Lang. 2006 Jun;97(3):258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.11.001. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
4
Are semantic errors actually semantic?: Evidence from alzheimer's disease.
Brain Lang. 2001 May;77(2):176-86. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2427.
5
What is semantic dementia?: a cohort study of diagnostic features and clinical boundaries.
Arch Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):483-9. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.55.
6
Omissions and semantic errors in aphasic naming: is there a link?
Brain Lang. 2008 Jan;104(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
7
Chinese word processing in nonfluent aphasic patients.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 20;122(16):1901-6.
8
Mimicking aphasic semantic errors in normal speech production: evidence from a novel experimental paradigm.
Brain Lang. 2008 Jan;104(1):89-101. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 May 4.
9
Syntactic-semantic relationships in the mental lexicon of aphasic patients.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2008 Oct-Nov;22(10-11):795-803. doi: 10.1080/02699200802130656.
10
Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 2. Analysis of errors.
Brain Lang. 2000 Jul;73(3):393-420. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2312.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Spanish writing abilities of children with developmental language disorder in expository texts.
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 11;15:1360245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360245. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验