Tavolacci Marie-Pierre, Ladner Joël, Bailly Laurent, Merle Véronique, Pitrou Isabelle, Czernichow Pierre
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;29(7):642-7. doi: 10.1086/588683.
To evaluate the knowledge of healthcare students after four curricula on infection control and to identify sources of information.
Cross-sectional study.
Four healthcare schools at Rouen University (Rouen, France).
Medical students, nursing students, assistant radiologist students, and physiotherapist students taking public health courses.
To measure students' knowledge of infection control and their sources of information, 6 multiple-choice questions were asked about 3 specific areas: standard precautions, hand hygiene, and nosocomial infection. Each questionnaire section had 10 possible points, for an overall perfect score of 30. The sources of information for these 3 areas were also recorded: self-learning, practice training in wards, formal training in wards, and teaching during the curriculum. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with acceptable level of knowledge.
Three hundred fifty students (107 medical students, 78 nursing students, 71 physiotherapist students, and 94 assistant radiologists tudents) were included in the study. The mean overall score (+/- SD) was 21.5 +/- 2.84. Nursing students had a better mean overall score (23.2 +/- 2.35) than did physiotherapist students (21.9 +/- 2.36), medical students (21.1 +/- 2.35), and assistant radiologist students (20.5 +/- 3.04; P.001). The mean scores ( +/- SD) for the component sections of the questionnaire were 8.5 +/- 1.4 for standard precautions, 7.4 +/- 1.26 for hand hygiene,and 5.7 +/- 1.55 for nosocomial infections (P .001). The main source of information was material taught during the curriculum.
The overall score for infection control indicated that instruction was effective; however, knowledge levels were different by area (the best scores were results of tests of standard precautions) and curriculum (nursing students achieved the best overall score). Ward training for daily infection control practice (ie, bedside instructions training and course work) could be improved for healthcare students.
评估接受四门感染控制课程后的医护专业学生的知识水平,并确定信息来源。
横断面研究。
鲁昂大学的四所医护学校(法国鲁昂)。
修读公共卫生课程的医学生、护理专业学生、放射科助理学生和物理治疗专业学生。
为了衡量学生对感染控制的知识及其信息来源,针对三个特定领域提出了6道多项选择题:标准预防措施、手卫生和医院感染。问卷的每个部分满分10分,总分30分。还记录了这三个领域的信息来源:自学、病房实践培训、病房正式培训以及课程教学。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与可接受知识水平相关的因素。
350名学生(107名医学生、78名护理专业学生、71名物理治疗专业学生和94名放射科助理学生)纳入研究。平均总分(±标准差)为21.5± 2.84。护理专业学生的平均总分(23.2±2.35)高于物理治疗专业学生(21.9±2.36)、医学生(21.1±2.35)和放射科助理学生(20.5±3.04;P<0.001)。问卷各部分的平均得分(±标准差)为:标准预防措施8.5±1.4分,手卫生7.4±1.26分,医院感染5.7±1.55分(P<0.001)。主要信息来源是课程讲授的内容。
感染控制的总体得分表明教学是有效的;然而,不同领域的知识水平有所差异(标准预防措施测试得分最高),不同课程的情况也不同(护理专业学生的总体得分最高)。医护专业学生的日常感染控制实践(即床边指导培训和课程作业)的病房培训有待改进。