Chirathaworn Chintana, Kaewopas Yada, Poovorawan Yong, Suwancharoen Duangjai
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2007 Nov;38(6):1111-4.
A slide agglutination test (SAT), LeptoTek Dri-Dot and IgM-ELISA were compared with a microscopic agglutination test (MAT) for the detection of Leptospira antibodies. Paired sera from 10 patients whose leptospirosis was clinically suspected and diagnosed by MAT, were evaluated in this study. Our data, especially from acute samples, demonstrate the SAT and Dri-Dot were more sensitive as initial screening tests than MAT. IgM-ELISA has an advantage over MAT, SAT, and Dri-Dot since the results can be interpreted from a single serum testing if the results of the test are positive. Eight of the ten cases could be diagnosed by IgM-ELISA. Our data suggest that IgM-ELISA may be used for the diagnosis of leptospirosis. However, the agglutination test is useful for screening and for secondary infection cases for which IgM antibodies may be undetectable. MAT can be performed as a reference test and when information regarding the causative serovar is required.
将玻片凝集试验(SAT)、LeptoTek Dri-Dot和IgM-ELISA与显微镜凝集试验(MAT)进行比较,以检测钩端螺旋体抗体。本研究评估了10例临床疑似钩端螺旋体病且经MAT确诊患者的配对血清。我们的数据,尤其是来自急性样本的数据表明,SAT和Dri-Dot作为初始筛查试验比MAT更敏感。IgM-ELISA比MAT、SAT和Dri-Dot具有优势,因为如果检测结果为阳性,可通过单次血清检测解释结果。10例病例中有8例可通过IgM-ELISA诊断。我们的数据表明,IgM-ELISA可用于钩端螺旋体病的诊断。然而,凝集试验对于筛查以及IgM抗体可能检测不到的继发感染病例很有用。MAT可作为参考试验,当需要有关致病血清型的信息时使用。