Duijts Saskia F A, Kant Ijmert, van den Brandt Piet A, Swaen Gerard M H
Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jul;50(7):765-76. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181651584.
To assess the effectiveness of a preventive coaching intervention on sickness absence due to psychosocial health complaints and on general well being of employees.
Employees at risk for sickness absence were identified and randomized. The intervention group received the preventive coaching program; the control group received usual care. Primary outcome measure of the trial is sickness absence due to psychosocial health complaints; secondary outcome measures are related to general well being, such as psychological distress, fatigue, and coping.
No effect of coaching on self-reported sickness absence due to psychosocial health complaints was found. The intervention group reported statistically significant improved health, declined psychological distress, less burnout, less need for recovery, and an increased satisfaction with life.
This study shows that the coaching intervention primarily has an effect on general well being of employees.
评估预防性指导干预对因心理社会健康问题导致的病假以及员工总体幸福感的有效性。
识别出有病假风险的员工并进行随机分组。干预组接受预防性指导项目;对照组接受常规护理。该试验的主要结局指标是因心理社会健康问题导致的病假;次要结局指标与总体幸福感相关,如心理困扰、疲劳和应对能力。
未发现指导对自我报告的因心理社会健康问题导致的病假有影响。干预组报告称在健康状况、心理困扰减轻、倦怠减少、恢复需求降低以及生活满意度提高方面有统计学意义上的显著改善。
本研究表明,指导干预主要对员工的总体幸福感有影响。