• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为了更好地理解患有常见心理健康问题的员工的工作参与情况:一项系统的现实主义综述。

Towards a better understanding of work participation among employees with common mental health problems: a systematic realist review.

机构信息

Occupation and health research group, HAN University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 6960, 6503 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Apr 1;48(3):173-189. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4005. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4005
PMID:34878557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9523465/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Common mental health problems (CMHP) represent a major health issue and burden to employees and employers. Under certain conditions work contributes to wellbeing and participation of employees with CMHP. Promoting work participation is important, however the specific conditions in which work participation occurs is complex and largely unclear. This calls for a novel, realistic approach to unravel the complex relationship between outcomes, context and underlying mechanisms of work participation.

METHODS

In the present realist review, peer-reviewed studies conducted between 1995 and 2020 were systematically reviewed on the outcome measures stay at work (SAW) and work performance (WP). The database search from seven databases identified 2235 records, of which 61 studies met the selection criteria and methodological rigor.

RESULTS

The synthesis demonstrates how work participation is promoted by the following mechanisms and contextual factors: (i) organizational climate and leadership, (ii) social support, (iii) perceived job characteristics, (iv) coping styles, (v) health symptoms and severity, (vi) personal characteristics, and (vii) features of interventions. An explanatory framework, based on the Capability-for-Work model, presents a new set of capabilities leading to SAW and WP.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic realist review revealed mechanisms and contextual factors that promote both SAW and WP among employees with CMHP. These show how the organizational climate, social support in the work context, job characteristics and certain capabilities enable employees with CMHP to participate at work. Our contributions and practical implications are discussed, providing valuable insights for employers, professionals and researchers in the development of evidence-based interventions.

摘要

目的

常见心理健康问题(CMHP)是员工和雇主面临的主要健康问题和负担。在某些条件下,工作有助于改善和促进患有 CMHP 的员工的参与度。促进工作参与度很重要,但工作参与度发生的具体条件很复杂,在很大程度上尚不清楚。这需要一种新颖、现实的方法来阐明工作参与度的结果、背景和潜在机制之间的复杂关系。

方法

在本次真实主义综述中,对 1995 年至 2020 年间进行的同行评审研究进行了系统综述,研究结果的衡量指标为“保持工作”(SAW)和“工作表现”(WP)。从七个数据库进行的数据库搜索共确定了 2235 条记录,其中 61 项研究符合选择标准和方法学严谨性。

结果

综合结果表明,工作参与度是通过以下机制和背景因素来促进的:(i)组织氛围和领导力,(ii)社会支持,(iii)感知到的工作特征,(iv)应对方式,(v)健康症状和严重程度,(vi)个人特征,以及(vii)干预措施的特征。基于工作能力模型的解释框架提出了一组新的能力,这些能力可以促进 SAW 和 WP。

结论

本系统的真实主义综述揭示了促进患有 CMHP 的员工保持工作和提高工作表现的机制和背景因素。这些因素展示了组织氛围、工作环境中的社会支持、工作特征和某些能力如何使患有 CMHP 的员工能够参与工作。我们讨论了研究的贡献和实际意义,为雇主、专业人士和研究人员在制定基于证据的干预措施方面提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c0/9523465/40f5400486e9/SJWEH-48-173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c0/9523465/fc205fa3f2b3/SJWEH-48-173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c0/9523465/b3b2c1890cb4/SJWEH-48-173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c0/9523465/40f5400486e9/SJWEH-48-173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c0/9523465/fc205fa3f2b3/SJWEH-48-173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c0/9523465/b3b2c1890cb4/SJWEH-48-173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c0/9523465/40f5400486e9/SJWEH-48-173-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards a better understanding of work participation among employees with common mental health problems: a systematic realist review.为了更好地理解患有常见心理健康问题的员工的工作参与情况:一项系统的现实主义综述。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Apr 1;48(3):173-189. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4005. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
7
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
8
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Employee Preference and Use of Employee Mental Health Programs: Mixed Methods Study.员工对员工心理健康项目的偏好与使用情况:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 5;12:e65750. doi: 10.2196/65750.
2
Managers' Use of Organizational Resources when Supporting Employees with Common Mental Disorders: A Swedish Qualitative Study.管理者在支持患有常见精神障碍的员工时对组织资源的利用:一项瑞典的定性研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10293-4.
3
What can be learned from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on work participation among people with work disabilities? A qualitative practice & policy perspective approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators for Return to Work from the Perspective of Workers with Common Mental Disorders with Short, Medium and Long-Term Sickness Absence: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.从短期、中期和长期病假的常见精神障碍工人的角度看重返工作岗位的障碍和促进因素:一项纵向定性研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Jun;32(2):272-283. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10004-9. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol.理解患有常见精神障碍的员工的工作参与情况:什么有效,对谁有效,在什么情况下有效,以及如何有效?一项系统的现实主义综述方案。
Work. 2021;69(3):827-838. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213515.
3
从新冠疫情危机对残疾劳动者工作参与度的影响中可以学到什么?一种定性的实践与政策视角方法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):1164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22300-7.
4
Salutogenic mechanisms in nature-based work: fostering sense of coherence for employees with limited capability for work.基于自然的工作中的健康促进机制:为工作能力有限的员工培养归属感。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae127.
5
Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders.对因肌肉骨骼疾病和常见精神障碍而休病假的工人恢复工作预后因素的系统评价和工具评估
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 17;19(7):e0307284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307284. eCollection 2024.
6
Factors Related to the Recurrence of Sickness Absence Due to Common Mental Health Disorders: A Systematic Review.常见精神健康障碍导致病假复发的相关因素:一项系统综述
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10224-9.
7
The significance of managers' knowledge of common mental disorders on managerial stigma towards employee depression: a cross-sectional study in Sweden.管理者对常见精神障碍的了解对其员工抑郁症管理耻辱感的影响:瑞典的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17577-5.
8
Exploring employees' coping with disability management practices at a South African university.探索南非一所大学员工对残疾管理措施的应对情况。
Afr J Disabil. 2023 Jul 25;12:1123. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1123. eCollection 2023.
9
Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial.雇主参与初级卫生保健是否能促进与压力相关的精神障碍患者的重返工作岗位?一项群组随机对照试验。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 20;24(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0.
10
Training for Supervisors to Improve Sustainable Employment of Employees with a work Disability: A Longitudinal Effect and Process Evaluation from an Intervention Study with Matched Controls.培训主管以提高残疾员工的可持续就业:一项干预研究的纵向效应和过程评估,采用匹配对照。
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Mar;34(1):180-196. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10118-2. Epub 2023 May 30.
How qualitative studies can strengthen occupational health research.
定性研究如何加强职业健康研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Mar 1;47(2):91-93. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3943. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Preventing sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a problem-solving-based intervention conducted by the Occupational Health Services.预防工作中患有常见精神障碍或与压力相关症状的员工缺勤:职业健康服务机构实施的基于问题解决的干预措施的一项群组随机对照试验。
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jul;77(7):454-461. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106353. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
5
Effects of a Tailored Brief Behavioral Therapy Application on Insomnia Severity and Social Disabilities Among Workers With Insomnia in Japan: A Randomized Clinical Trial.日本一项针对失眠症患者的随机临床试验表明,应用个性化简短行为疗法对失眠严重程度和社交障碍的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202775. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2775.
6
Effect of Adding a Work-Focused Intervention to Integrated Care for Depression in the Veterans Health Administration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在退伍军人事务部的抑郁症综合护理中加入以工作为重点的干预措施的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200075. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0075.
7
Workplace-Based Organizational Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Happiness among Healthcare Workers: A Realist Review.基于工作场所的组织干预措施促进医护人员的心理健康和幸福感:一项现实主义综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224396.
8
A systematic review of work accommodations for people with mental disorders.对精神障碍患者工作适应性的系统评价。
Work. 2019;64(3):461-475. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193008.
9
Opening the black box: Examining the nomological network of work ability and its role in organizational research.打开黑箱:审视工作能力的规范网络及其在组织研究中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Jun;105(6):637-670. doi: 10.1037/apl0000454. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Association between job-related stress and experience of presenteeism among Korean workers stratified on the presence of depression.韩国劳动者中与工作相关的压力与出勤主义经历之间的关联:基于抑郁状态分层分析
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep 30;31:e26. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2019.31.e26. eCollection 2019.