Van der Heyden J, Lans H W, van Werkum J W, Schepens M, Ackerstaff R G, Suttorp M J
Department of Interventional Cardiology, St-Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Oct;36(4):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
In the absence of randomized trials, the optimal management of patients who present with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease remains an enduring controversy, with much of the debate revolving around whether staged or synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) will reduce peri-operative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Although encouraging results have been reported using either strategy, there remains no consensus as to which is preferable. More recently, however, carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS) has emerged as a potential alternative to CEA. In 'high-risk for CEA' patients, CAS has shown comparable short and long-term outcome rates to CEA. Accordingly, CAS followed by cardiac surgery could offer a less invasive (and safer) therapeutic option in cardiac patients. This paper reviews the evidence to date supporting the use of CAS+CABG, while highlighting potential situations where such a strategy might be harmful. In particular, it will focus on how the need for dual antiplatelet therapy after CAS can be balanced with avoiding unnecessary bleeding complications after cardiac surgery.
在缺乏随机试验的情况下,对于同时患有颈动脉和冠状动脉疾病的患者,最佳治疗方案仍存在长期争议,大部分争论集中在分期或同步进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是否会降低心脏手术后的围手术期发病率和死亡率。尽管采用这两种策略均已报告了令人鼓舞的结果,但对于哪种策略更可取仍未达成共识。然而,最近,颈动脉血管成形术加支架置入术(CAS)已成为CEA的一种潜在替代方法。在“CEA高风险”患者中,CAS已显示出与CEA相当的短期和长期预后率。因此,先进行CAS再进行心脏手术可能为心脏病患者提供一种侵入性较小(且更安全)的治疗选择。本文回顾了迄今为止支持使用CAS+CABG(冠状动脉旁路移植术)的证据,同时强调了这种策略可能有害的潜在情况。特别是,它将重点关注如何在CAS后使用双重抗血小板治疗的需求与避免心脏手术后不必要的出血并发症之间取得平衡。