Muthurangu Vivek, Lurz Philip, Critchely Jeffery D, Deanfield John E, Taylor Andrew M, Hansen Michael S
Centre for Cardiovascular MR, Cardiothoracic Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford St, London WC1N 1EH, England.
Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):782-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482071717. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
The purpose of this study was to compare ventricular volumes in patients with congenital heart disease measured by using (a) a cardiac gated sequence, (b) a standard real-time sequence, and (c) a radial real-time k-space and time (k-t) sensitivity encoding (SENSE) sequence.
The local research ethics committee approved this study, and written consent was obtained from all participants. Of 40 patients with congenital heart disease, ventricular volumes were measured by using the three sequences. Global image quality and motion fidelity were scored and compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Image contrast, edge sharpness, and summed perimeters (the total length of the endocardial tracings for a given ventricle at systole and diastole) were quantified and compared by using paired t tests. Ventricular volumes were compared with paired t tests, Bland-Altman analysis, and correlation coefficients.
Global image quality, motion fidelity, image contrast, edge sharpness, and summed perimeters were all greater for radial real-time k-t SENSE imaging compared with standard real-time imaging (P < .05). However, the gated acquisitions were significantly superior to radial real-time k-t SENSE (P < .05). For cardiac gated versus radial k-t real-time acquisitions, there was no difference between right ventricular (RV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) (P > .15). There was a small difference in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV) and thus, LV stroke volume and EF (P < .05). For cardiac gated versus standard real-time acquisitions, both RV and LV EDV and thus, stroke volume and EF were significantly lower (P < .05).
Ventricular volumes and function can be accurately quantified by using radial k-t SENSE real-time imaging.
本研究的目的是比较先天性心脏病患者使用(a)心脏门控序列、(b)标准实时序列和(c)径向实时k空间和时间(k-t)敏感性编码(SENSE)序列测量的心室容积。
当地研究伦理委员会批准了本研究,并获得了所有参与者的书面同意。对40例先天性心脏病患者,使用这三种序列测量心室容积。对整体图像质量和运动保真度进行评分,并采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。使用配对t检验对图像对比度、边缘清晰度和周长总和(给定心室在收缩期和舒张期的心内膜描记的总长度)进行量化和比较。采用配对t检验、Bland-Altman分析和相关系数对心室容积进行比较。
与标准实时成像相比,径向实时k-t SENSE成像的整体图像质量、运动保真度、图像对比度、边缘清晰度和周长总和均更高(P < 0.05)。然而,门控采集明显优于径向实时k-t SENSE(P < 0.05)。对于心脏门控与径向k-t实时采集,右心室(RV)容积和射血分数(EF)之间无差异(P > 0.15)。左心室(LV)舒张末期容积(EDV)存在微小差异,因此,左心室搏出量和EF也存在微小差异(P < 0.05)。对于心脏门控与标准实时采集,右心室和左心室EDV以及搏出量和EF均显著降低(P < 0.05)。
使用径向k-t SENSE实时成像可以准确量化心室容积和功能。