• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院选择的比较质量指标:全科医生在意吗?

Comparative Quality Indicators for Hospital Choice: Do General Practitioners Care?

作者信息

Ferrua Marie, Sicotte Claude, Lalloué Benoît, Minvielle Etienne

机构信息

EHESP-MOS (École des hautes études en santé publique - Management des organisations de santé), Institut Gustave Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant 94805, Villejuif, France.

Département d'administration de la santé, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0147296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147296. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0147296
PMID:26840429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4740419/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The strategy of publicly reporting quality indicators is being widely promoted through public policies as a way to make health care delivery more efficient.

OBJECTIVE

To assess general practitioners' (GPs) use of the comparative hospital quality indicators made available by public services and the media, as well as GPs' perceptions of their qualities and usefulness.

METHOD

A telephone survey of a random sample representing all self-employed GPs in private practice in France.

RESULTS

A large majority (84.1%-88.5%) of respondents (n = 503; response rate of 56%) reported that they never used public comparative indicators, available in the mass media or on government and non-government Internet sites, to influence their patients' hospital choices. The vast majority of GPs rely mostly on traditional sources of information when choosing a hospital. At the same time, this study highlights favourable opinions shared by a large proportion of GPs regarding several aspects of hospital quality indicators, such as their good qualities and usefulness for other purposes. In sum, the results show that GPs make very limited use of hospital quality indicators based on a consumer choice paradigm but, at the same time, see them as useful in ways corresponding more to the usual professional paradigms, including as a means to improve quality of care.

摘要

背景

通过公共政策广泛推广公开报告质量指标的策略,以此提高医疗服务效率。

目的

评估全科医生(GPs)对公共服务和媒体提供的医院质量比较指标的使用情况,以及全科医生对这些指标的质量和实用性的看法。

方法

对法国私人执业的所有个体经营全科医生进行随机抽样电话调查。

结果

绝大多数(84.1%-88.5%)受访者(n = 503;回复率为56%)表示,他们从未使用大众媒体、政府及非政府网站上提供的公共比较指标来影响患者的医院选择。绝大多数全科医生在选择医院时主要依赖传统信息来源。与此同时,本研究凸显了很大一部分全科医生对医院质量指标的几个方面持赞同意见,比如指标的良好质量以及在其他方面的实用性。总之,结果表明,全科医生基于消费者选择模式对医院质量指标的使用非常有限,但同时,他们认为这些指标在更符合常规专业模式的方面很有用,包括作为提高医疗质量的一种手段。

相似文献

1
Comparative Quality Indicators for Hospital Choice: Do General Practitioners Care?医院选择的比较质量指标:全科医生在意吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0147296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147296. eCollection 2016.
2
The use of public performance reporting by general practitioners: a study of perceptions and referral behaviours.全科医生对公共绩效报告的使用:一项关于认知和转诊行为的研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 12;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0719-4.
3
Effect of the Iranian hospital grading system on patients' and general practitioners' behaviour: an examination of awareness, belief and choice.伊朗医院分级系统对患者及全科医生行为的影响:对认知、信念和选择的考察
Health Serv Manage Res. 2010 Aug;23(3):139-44. doi: 10.1258/hsmr.2009.009028.
4
Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care.患者与全科医生对全科医疗服务评价的比较。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):315-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.315.
5
The use of quality information by general practitioners: does it alter choices? A randomized clustered study.全科医生对质量信息的使用:是否会改变选择?一项随机聚类研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jul 8;14:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-95.
6
Design of a national and regional survey among French general practitioners and method of the first wave of survey dedicated to vaccination.法国全科医生全国及地区调查设计与首轮疫苗接种调查方法
Med Mal Infect. 2015 Oct;45(10):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
Which factors decided general practitioners' choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study.哪些因素决定了在可自由选择公立医院的地区,全科医生代表患者选择医院?一项问卷调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 25;12:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-126.
8
Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners' Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based Survey: A Randomized Trial.全科医生对邮寄调查与基于网络调查的回复率、延迟情况及完整性:一项随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 22;19(3):e83. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6308.
9
How public reporting of prescription quality indicators influence prescribing practices? A survey of general practitioners.处方质量指标的公开报告如何影响处方行为?一项针对全科医生的调查。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;21(5):943-51. doi: 10.1111/jep.12410. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
10
Public performance reporting and hospital choice: a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing cancer surgery in the Australian private healthcare sector.公开绩效报告与医院选择:对澳大利亚私立医疗部门癌症手术患者的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 27;8(4):e020644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020644.

引用本文的文献

1
The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments.患者和医生对计算医院报告卡上基于消费者的综合指标的偏好的启发:两项离散选择实验的结果。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):1071-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01650-2. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
Referring physicians' intention to use hospital report cards for hospital referral purposes in the presence or absence of patient-reported outcomes: a randomized trial.有(无)患者报告结局时,转诊医师使用医院报告卡进行医院转诊的意向:一项随机试验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;25(2):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01587-6. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
The association between various indicators of hospital capacity, age category, and the number of screening tests performed with case fatality rate and recovery rate during the COVID-19 disease pandemic.在 COVID-19 疾病大流行期间,医院容量的各种指标、年龄类别以及筛查测试数量与病死率和康复率之间的关系。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Jul 30;62(2):E261-E269. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1569. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Perspective of potential patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the minimum volume threshold for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative focus group and interview study.潜在患者对医院量效关系和全膝关节置换术最低容量阈值的看法:一项定性焦点小组和访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06641-8.
5
Determinants of physician networks: an ethnographic study examining the processes that inform patterns of collaboration and referral decision-making among physicians.医生网络的决定因素:一项人种志研究,考察影响医生之间合作模式和转诊决策过程的因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e042334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042334.
6
The use of public performance reporting by general practitioners: a study of perceptions and referral behaviours.全科医生对公共绩效报告的使用:一项关于认知和转诊行为的研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 12;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0719-4.
7
Public release of hospital quality data for referral practices in Germany: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.德国转诊医疗中医院质量数据的公开发布:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Sep 26;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0171-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case.医疗保健领域新公共管理评估:以法国为例。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Oct 6;12:57. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-57.
2
Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards.自上而下和自下而上的医疗质量方法:监管和报告卡的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:477-97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313-115826. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
3
The use of quality information by general practitioners: does it alter choices? A randomized clustered study.全科医生对质量信息的使用:是否会改变选择?一项随机聚类研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jul 8;14:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-95.
4
Method for developing national quality indicators based on manual data extraction from medical records.基于从医疗记录中手动提取数据制定国家质量指标的方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):155-62. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001170. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills.了解和使用比较医疗保健信息;信息数量和消费者特征与技能的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 7;12:101. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-101.
6
Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.患者选择医疗服务提供者的决定因素:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 22;12:272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-272.
7
[Do physicians know and use mandatory quality reports?].[医生了解并使用强制性质量报告吗?]
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Mar;75(3):155-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321744. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
8
Which factors decided general practitioners' choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study.哪些因素决定了在可自由选择公立医院的地区,全科医生代表患者选择医院?一项问卷调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 25;12:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-126.
9
Suitability of three indicators measuring the quality of coordination within hospitals.三种指标衡量医院内协调性质量的适宜性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 8;10:93. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-93.
10
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.医疗保健消费者如何处理和评估比较性医疗保健信息?一项使用认知访谈的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 20;9:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-423.