Department of Health and Social Behavior, School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
School of Aging Studies, College of Behavioral & Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211984. eCollection 2019.
To explore influential factors contributing to the choice of primary care facilities (PCFs) for the initial treatment among rural and urban residents in Southwestern China.
A face-to-face survey was conducted on a multistage stratified random sample of 456 rural and 459 urban residents in Sichuan Province from January to August in 2014. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on residents' characteristics, provider of initial treatment and principal reason for the choice. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with choosing PCFs for the initial treatment.
The result showed that 65.4% of the rural residents and 50.5% of the urban residents chose PCFs as their initial contact for medical care. Among both rural and urban residents, the principal reason for choosing medical institutions for the initial treatment was convenience (42.3% versus 40.5%, respectively), followed by high quality of medical care (26.5% versus 29.4%, respectively). Compared to rural residents, urban residents were more likely to value trust in doctors and high quality of medical care but were less likely to value the insurance designation status of the facilities. Logistic regression analysis showed that both rural and urban residents were less likely to choose PCFs for the initial treatment if they lived more than 15 minutes (by walk) from the nearest facilities (rural: OR = 0.15, 95%CI = 0.09-0.26; urban: OR = 0.19, 95%CI = 0.10-0.36), had fair (rural: OR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.26-0.92; urban: OR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.15-0.64) or poor (rural: OR = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.07-0.30; urban: OR = 0.22, 95%CI = 0.11-0.44) self-reported health status. Among rural residents, attending college or higher education (OR = 0.21, 95%CI = 0.08-0.59), being retired (OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.44-1.84) and earning a per capita annual income of household of 10,000-29,999 (OR = 0.24, 95%CI = 0.11-0.52) and 30,000-49,999 (OR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.07-0.92) were associated with lower rates of seeking care at PCFs.
Efforts should be made to improve the accessibility of PCFs and to upgrade the services capability of PCFs both in rural and urban areas in China. At the same time, resources should be prioritized to residents with poorer self-reported health status, and rural residents who retire or have better education and higher income levels should be taken into account.
探讨中国西南部农村和城市居民选择基层医疗保健机构(PCF)进行初始治疗的影响因素。
2014 年 1 月至 8 月,采用多阶段分层随机抽样方法,对四川省的 456 名农村居民和 459 名城市居民进行了面对面调查。使用结构化问卷收集居民特征、初始治疗提供者和选择主要原因的数据。采用多变量 logistic 回归分析确定与选择 PCF 进行初始治疗相关的因素。
结果显示,65.4%的农村居民和 50.5%的城市居民选择 PCF 作为他们的初始医疗接触点。在农村和城市居民中,选择医疗机构进行初始治疗的主要原因是便利性(分别为 42.3%和 40.5%),其次是医疗质量(分别为 26.5%和 29.4%)。与农村居民相比,城市居民更看重医生的信任和医疗质量,但不太看重医疗机构的保险指定状态。logistic 回归分析显示,如果农村居民居住的地方距离最近的医疗机构超过 15 分钟(步行距离)(农村:OR = 0.15,95%CI = 0.09-0.26;城市:OR = 0.19,95%CI = 0.10-0.36),或者他们的自我报告健康状况为一般(农村:OR = 0.49,95%CI = 0.26-0.92;城市:OR = 0.31,95%CI = 0.15-0.64)或差(农村:OR = 0.14,95%CI = 0.07-0.30;城市:OR = 0.22,95%CI = 0.11-0.44),那么他们选择 PCF 进行初始治疗的可能性较小。在农村居民中,接受过大学或以上教育(OR = 0.21,95%CI = 0.08-0.59)、退休(OR = 0.90,95%CI = 0.44-1.84)以及家庭人均年收入为 10000-29999 元(OR = 0.24,95%CI = 0.11-0.52)和 30000-49999 元(OR = 0.26,95%CI = 0.07-0.92)的人,到 PCF 就诊的比例较低。
应努力改善中国农村和城市地区的 PCF 的可及性,并提升其服务能力。同时,应优先考虑自我报告健康状况较差的居民,以及农村退休人员和受教育程度较高、收入水平较高的居民。